An Investigation on the Degree of Urban Cooperation within Urban Neighborhoods Considering an Emphasis on Social Indifference (Case Study: Meymeh City)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. in Cultural Sociology, Lecturer of Farhangian University, Shahid Rajaee, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Master of Geography, Researcher and High school teacher, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Master of Sociology, Researcher and High school teacher, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract
Indifference has been defined as retreating and lack of expected cooperation. Throughout this process, the individual separates him/herself from a particular system of belief or thought. To put it differently, social indifference can be best assumed as an individual’s lack of engagement in social life. The present study aims to measure the degree of social indifference and consequently investigate the degree of urban cooperation alongside different social and construction dimensions among Meymeh citizens. Accordingly, the topic under study has been studied considering variables including urban aesthetics, trust in officials regarding urban planning, and local and state renewal and cooperation. Methodologically, the present study has made use of survey and researcher-made instruments. The sample under study has been randomly selected and includes 400 18-64-year-old Meymeh City citizens during the 2019-2020 period. The results of item synthesis about the degree of social indifference illustrate that social indifference has been measured as 52% (i.e., average level) among most of the study participants.
Moreover, the results suggest a correlation between social indifference and the degree of social cooperation. This study confirms the supposed difference between social and construction cooperation across different neighborhoods. Further, the authors argue that the degree of social indifference is not meant to be the same across different neighborhoods.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Pourakbar, Hamid Reza, Abbaszadeh, Shahab (1400/2021), “The Concept of Urban Landscape for Enhancing Memorability in Urban Space: Art and Architecture,” Journal of Architectural Studies, Spring, Issue 18, pp. 1-88. [In Persian]
  2. Pourzakaria, Maryam (1397/2018), “Hub, Cultural Creative, a New Approach in Cultural Regeneration, Meaning, Review and Analysis of Folkestone Creative Hub,” Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Planning of Islamic Countries, September, Scientific Document CAUCONF01_0817. [In Persian]
  3. Durkheim, Émile (1404/2025), Suicide, Translated by Nader Salarzadeh Amiri, Tehran: Allameh Tabataba’i University, Fourth Printing, p. 98. [In Persian]
  4. Rezaei, Faramarz, Chitsaz, Mohammad Ali and Shapor, Bayan (1399/2020), “Examining Urban Graphics with Social and Economic Issues and its Impact on Citizens’ Political Apathy,” Journal of Islamic Art Studies, Issue 45, Vol. 19, pp. 239-258. [In Persian]
  5. Sefiri, Khadijeh, Hojjati Kermani, Soudheh (1399/2020), “Sociological Study of Social Apathy in Tehran,” Quarterly Journal of Iranian Association for Cultural and Communication Studies, Autumn, Vol. 6, Issue 16, p. 113. [In Persian]
  6. Sotoodeh, Hedayatollah (1392/2013), Social Pathology; Sociology of Deviations, Twenty-second Printing, Tehran: Avaye Noor Publications, p. 243. [In Persian]
  7. Shokooei, Hossein (1399/2020), New Perspectives in Urban Geography, Volume One, Twentieth Printing, Tehran: Agah Publications, p. 320. [In Persian]
  8. Shahab Samani, Mohsen (1395/2016), “A Comparative Study of Social Apathy Among Students of Isfahan and Yazd Universities with Emphasis on Social Capital (Master’s Thesis in Social Research),” Yazd University, College of Humanities and Social Sciences. [In Persian]
  9. Anbari, Musa, Gholamiyan, Sara (1395/2016), “Sociological Explanation of Factors Related to Social Apathy,” Scientific-Research Journal of Iranian Social Issues, Autumn 13(7), Issue 2, p. 133. [In Persian]
  10. Feizollahi, Ali, Kianerbigi, Khalil (1400/2021), “Roots and Consequences of the Phenomenon of Social Apathy (Case Study of Citizens in Ilam Province),” Quarterly Journal of Iranian Cultural Research, Autumn, 14(3), pp. 151-179, Consecutive Issue 55, p. 151. [In Persian]
  11. Feizollahi, Ali, Kianerbigi, Khalil (1400/2021), “Identification and Prioritization of Social Issues and Problems in Ilam Province,” Scientific-Research Quarterly Journal of Social and Cultural Strategies, Summer, Vol. 10, Issue 39, pp. 278-317. [In Persian]
  12. Fouladian, Ahmad (1399/2020), “Investigating the Relationship Between Social Alienation and the Degree of Social Apathy Among Students of Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch,” Quarterly Journal of Sociological Studies of Youth, Spring, Year 5, Issue 17, pp. 125-144. [In Persian]
  13. Karimi, Reza, Mohseni Tabrizi, Ali Reza and Navabakhsh, Mehrdad (1387/2008), “Sociological Explanation of Youth Participation, Causes, Forms, and Challenges (Case Study: Tehran City),” Scientific-Research Journal of Sports and Youth Strategic Studies, December, Vol. 15, Issue 33, pp. 9-44. [In Persian]S.2015. Rols of socioeconomic ststus and political participation in construction of apathy among youth.Journal Of Human Behavior in the Social Environment,25(8),801-809.
  14. Courtis, S (2002) "Le patriotisme constitutionnel de Habermas face au nationalisme qubecois" In Dialogue, XLI, pp. 765-94.
  15. Charuvichaipong, Chanisada and Sajor, Edsel (2006) Promoting waste separation for Recycling and local governauce in Thailand, Habitat International, 30.
  16. Deriscol, J. W., 1978, Trust and Participation, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21,No.1, PP.44-56.
  17. Degler,H,(1998) ,Parentel Roles Moder,Gender and Education.
  18. Edwards, J. N. & Booth, A., 1973, Social Participation in Urban Society, Schekman Publishing Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts.P:210.
  19. Lee, E., 2006, Asocial Resource Model of Political Participation, Mass Media Use, Social Capital, and Political Participation (Dissertation), Cornel University ,UAS.P:96.

 

  1. Murty, J.; Paneb, M. (2013). Apathy towards Environmental Issues, Narcissism, and Competitive View of the World, Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 101, pp. 44 – 52.
  2. Macdonald, Iaura (2000) Citizenship Participation the Public sphere in the Americans University.
  3. Munch,Richard (1998) Understanding Modernity. London:m:Routledge.p:68.
  4. Mutz, D.C., 2005, Social Trust and E Commerce: Experimental Evidence for Social Trust in Individuals, Economic Behavior, Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 69, No.3, P.393.
  5. Marshal, M., 2004, Citizen Participation and the Neighborhood Context: a New at the Corproduction of Local Public Goods, Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 2,P.238.
  6. Oxford Advanced Learners(2008s).
  7. Paxton, Pamela (1999), "Is social capital docling in the United State?", A Multiple Indicator Assessment. AJS.,Vol. 105, No. 1.
  8. Rubin M.; Badea C.; Condie J.; Mahfud Y.; Morrison T.; Peker M. (2017). Individual differences in collectivism predict city identification and city evaluation in Australian, French, and Turkish cities, Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 50, pp. 9-16
  9. Sarfaraz, A, Ahmed, sh. (2012). Reasons for political interest and apathy among university students: A Qualitative study. Pakistan journal of social psychology, vol 10, no, 1, 61-67.
  10. Schubler, Peter (1996) Participation and Partnership in urban management and Infrastructure. Washington D. C: Programme by world Bank
  11. Schatzow,Steven. (1977).The Influence of Publican Federal Environment, Decision Making in Canada in public participation in planning.
  12. Silverman, R. M, 2006,Central City Socioeconomic Characteristics and Public Participation Strategies, A Comparative Analysis of the Niagara Falls Region's Municipalities in the USA and Canada, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3/4, P:143.