Exploring the identity components of Urban Facades; a study on the physical Identity of Golestan Neighborhood in Sabzevar

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran

3 Senior Lecturer, PhD in Urbanism, Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract
Introduction
Due to the dangers of homogenization of urban spaces resulting from globalization processes during urban developments, the need to preserve local identities for urban spaces is increasingly felt, and the preservation of local identities is necessary. Koy-e Golestan as a settlement for the minority group of Romanians in the historical center of Sabzevar city, has unique architectural features specific to the indigenous residents of this area.
Also, urban studies show that building facades have a prominent role on physical identity of urban areas. The case study- Golestan neighborhood- is a settlement for Romani people in the center of the city of Sabzevar which due to its deterioration needs urgent spatial-physical interventions. While the aforementioned neighborhood is located in the historical center of the city and has several valuable historical monuments, studies show implementing spatial-physical interventions in areas like this without considering their local spatial identity will have adverse effects on reducing the identity of these areas, and provoking a sense of delocalization in the form of alienation from the place and so on.
So in these regards, this research to serve as a proper urban preservation policy for the future interventions, has tried to explore the identifying components of the building facades of the Golestan neighborhood. According to the studies, facades, as the most important part of the city's physical mass, is considered an important part of its identity. Also, in this study regarding previous research, the identity components of the building facades of Golestan has been explored on the basis of seven categories of its overall components: 1- overall shape of the facade, 2- main lines, 3- dividing lines, 4- openings and apertures, 5- details and extensions, 6- materials and textures, and 7- colors.
In general, in Golestan neighborhood, we see two types of building facades: old and renovated. While Most of the renovated building facades in the neighborhood are made of brick, and sometimes ceramic or stone, this is a characteristic of older buildings with brick or thatched roofs. Also, as what has been discussed in the research findings, in the neighborhood's native and old architecture, we see a variety of designs and architectural details such as railings, turned windows, brickwork, and shelters with brick knots. In the renovations carried out in new buildings, we see the use of new materials such as stone, ceramics, and metal doors and windows, along with a noticeable difference in the patterns of building facades with other areas of the city.
Research Methodology
Totally, this study in order to achieve the study goal, by reviewing the literature on physical identity, building facades and the facades constituent components on physical identity of buildings, has conducted a field study on the case study of Golestan. As mentioned above, in the field study phase, the research was conducted to collect and record data based on two parts of uncontrolled (free) observation, and controlled observations and recordings with the help of photography. In case of mentioned field study, a two-round Delphi technique has been carried out among 14 experts based on 80 selected images in 8 general categories of facade components which has been taken from the building of the neighborhood. At this stage, 15 experts in the field of architecture and urban planning working and living in Sabzevar, familiar with the historical architectural features of this neighborhood, and who also have a relative knowledge of Golestan and its residents were identified and selected that 14 people collaborated with this research.
Result and discussion
According to the findings, the identifying components of Koy-e Golestan building facades could be conceptualized in 17 initial and 7 main concepts. The initial concepts consists of natural and historical symbolism, using of floral and plant elements, using of images of the religious characters, using of religious symbols, ostentatiousness, colorfulness, luxurious, variety in lines, sharp geometry, unconventional geometric combinations, excessive use of arrays, richness in patterns, excessive attention to detail, imitation, variety in patterns, fineness, and repetition. Also The findings showed that the concepts of natural-historical symbolism, religious symbolism, the desire to show off, shape and form fashionism, heavy attention to details, eclecticism, and emphasis on creating a dense texture, are the recognizable aspects of the physical identity of the building facades of Koy-e Golestan.
Concolusion
According to this study, while building facades are deeply connected with the cultural and social contexts, the physical identity components identified in Golestan neighborhood are related to the cultural-identity characteristics of the ethnic community living in Golestan. Based on the results of this research, in general, religious orientation and devotion to the Ahl al-Bayt (PBUH), the desire to self-expression and to be seen, and the personalization of the lived environment are the ethnic community grounded context which is effective on the creation of specific architecture patterns of Koy-e Golestan. This study by exploring the identifying components of Golestan neighborhood building facades, points out to the distinctive and coherent dimensions of the physical identity components of Golestan, in which are necessary for urban design policies and guidelines in terms of urban tourism, regeneration, and housing in the future decision making and decision taking by the authorities about the area.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Atashinbar, Mohammad. (2009). Continuity of Identity in Urban Landscape. Bagh Negar Scientific Journal, 6(12), 45-56. [In Persian]
  2. Ajzashkoohi, Mohammad. (2005). Urban Centers and Ethnic Ghettos: (Case Study of Gypsies in Sabzevar City). Geography and Regional Development, (5), 225-245. doi:10.22067/geography.v3i5.3061 [In Persian]
  3. Ahmadi, Fazlollah; Nasiriyani, Khadijeh; & Abazari, Parvaneh. (2008). Delphi Technique: A Tool for Research. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 8(1 (19)), 175-185. https://sid.ir/paper/441616/fa [In Persian]
  4. Ahmadi Far, Narges; Meshkini, Abolfazl; & Nasirian, Asghar. (2006). Investigating Changes in the Physical and Functional Aspects of Old Tehran’s Texture with Emphasis on Region 4, District 11. Geographical Journal of the Land, 3(12), 26-47. https://www.magiran.com/p1304465 [In Persian]
  5. Arya, Engineering Consultants Haft Shahr. (2012). Improvement and Renovation Plan for the Deteriorated Texture of Golestan. [In Persian]
  6. Aminzadeh, Behnaz. (2010). Evaluating Aesthetics and Place Identity. Identity City, 4(7), 3-14. http://noo.rs/6nfEf [In Persian]
  7. Barzgar, Asma; Noorollahi, Mojtaba; & Arayesh, Mohammad Baqer. (2023). Providing a Conceptual Model Emphasizing Effective Components in Urban Façade Identity Based on Meta-Synthesis Method. Journal of Identity City, 53(17), 87-102. doi:10.30495/Hoviatshahr.2023.68523.12242 [In Persian]
  8. Bazrgar, Mohammad Reza. (2017). Investigate the Role of Urban Elements in Strengthening Physical Identity; Case Study: Shiraz City. Urban Research and Planning, 8, 83-100. doi:20.1001.1.22285229.1396.8.30.6.2 [In Persian]
  9. Bamanian, Mohammad Reza; Gholami Roustem, Nasim; & Rahmat Panah, Janat. (2010). Identity-Building Elements in Traditional Iranian Houses: A Case Study of Rasuliyan House in Yazd. Islamic Art Studies, 7(13), 55-68. https://sid.ir/paper/136845/fa [In Persian]
  10. Bentley, Iain. (2003). Responsive Environments: A Guidebook for Designers (Translated by Mostafa Behzadfar). Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology. [In Persian]
  11. Behzadfar, Mostafa. (2007). City Identity: A Look at the Identity of Tehran. Tehran: Tehran Cultural and Artistic Organization. [In Persian]
  12. Pakzad, Jahanshah. (2013). Articles on Urban Design. Tehran: Shahidi. [In Persian]
  13. Tosli, Mahmoud & Eskandrafshar, Behzad. (2000). Urban Design of Kargar Street: The Space Between Enghelab Square and Har Square. Tehran: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development. [In Persian]
  14. Jalili Sadra Abad, Samaneh & Balbali, Shiva. (2017). Analyzing the Role of Materials in Urban Facades Using a Sustainable Urban Development Approach. Naghsh-e-Jahan, 7, 49-57. doi:20.1001.1.23224991.1396.7.2.8.5 [In Persian]
  15. Habib, Farah & Naderi, Seyed Majid. (2008). Discrimination in the Discourse of Urban Form and Identity (Is Urban Form Subservient to Identity or is Identity Subservient to Urban Form?). Identity City, 2(3), 13-23. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/hoviatshahr/Article/795287/FullText [In Persian]
  16. Khakzand, Mehdi; Mohammadi, Maryam; Jam, Fatemeh; & Aghabozorgi, Kourosh. (2014). Identifying Effective Factors in the Design of Urban Bodies Emphasizing Aesthetic and Environmental Aspects (Case Study: Vali Asr Street, Qeshm City). Urban Studies Journal, 3(10), 15-26. https://urbstudies.uok.ac.ir/article_8763.html [In Persian]
  17. Dehkhoda, Ali Akbar. (1966). Dehkhoda Dictionary. Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
  18. Zekavat, Kamran. (2006). Strategic Framework for Visual City Management. Abadi, Vol. 16 (new) (18), 26-41. [In Persian]
  19. Rakhshan, Ehsan; Zabihi, Hossein; & Majidi, Hamid. (2018). Revisiting Identity-Building Components in the Facades of Contemporary Cities. Urban Management, 17(51), 75-86. [In Persian]
  20. Rafiei, Mojtaba; Ajilian Mamtaaz, Shiva; & Shiripour, Mehdi. (2014). The Mandate Planning Approach in Urban Planning (Case Study: Sabzevar City, Golestan Neighborhood). Geographical Researches in Urban Planning, 2(3), 277-301. [In Persian]
  21. Sarmad, Zahra; Bazargan Herandi, Abbas; & Hajazi, Elham. (2008). Research Methods in Behavioral Sciences. Tehran: Agha Publishing Institute. [In Persian]
  22. Soltani Fard, Hadi; Hatami Nejad, Hossein; Abbaszadegan, Mostafa; & Pour Ahmad, Ahmad. (2013). Analyzing the Transformation of Spatial Structure in Iranian-Islamic Cities (Case Study: Sabzevar City). Studies of Iranian-Islamic Cities, (14), 13-21. http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-489-fa.html [In Persian]
  23. Abedi, Mohammad Mahdi. (2013). Facade Additions: A Forgotten Need. Architecture and Culture, 51. [In Persian]
  24. Abedini, Asghar; Sabatani, Naser; & Golshani, Mina. (2019). Analyzing the Impact of Physical Changes on the Spatial Structure of the Historical Area of Urmia Using Space Syntax and GIS. Human Geography Research, 51(1), 79-96. [In Persian]
  25. Azizi, Mohammad Mahdi; & Arbab, Parsa. (2010). Identifying and Evaluating the Formation Process of Identity in New Cities; Case Study: Hashtgerd New City. Fine Arts - Architecture and Urban Planning, (42), 47-58. doi:20.1001.1.22286020.1389.2.42.5.4 [In Persian]
  26. Kiani, Akbar; Salarisardari, Farzali; & Afrasiabi Rad, Mohammad Sadegh. (2010). Investigating Urban Identity in the Rehabilitation and Renovation of Historical Textures (Case Study: Goor-Firoozabad City). Scientific-Research Journal of Geographical Space, 10(3), 21-43. [In Persian]
  27. Lang, Jan. (2014). Creating Architectural Theory (Translated by Alireza Ainyfar). Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
  28. Masoud, Mohammad; & Bigzadeh Shahreki, Hamidreza. (2012). Preserving and Revitalizing Motifs of Urban Spaces. Urban Research and Planning, 3(10), 43-66. doi:20.1001.1.22285229.1391.3.10.3.4 [In Persian]
  29. Masoudinejad, Sara; & Aliyas, Zeynab. (2018). Investigating the Beauty Components of Façades and Their Effect on Urban Identity. International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Development in Iran, Tehran. [In Persian]
  30. Mahrani, Hamid. (2014). Architecture and Architects of Sabzevar. Tehran: Firoozi. [In Persian]
  31. Moien, Mohammad. (1992). Persian Culture. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publishing Institute. [In Persian]
  32. Mahdizadeh Saraj, Fatemeh; & Tabatabai, Tanaz. (2008). Identity-Forming Factors in Indigenous Iranian Cities. Haft Shahr, 2(25 and 26), 60-70. [In Persian]
  33. Engineering Consultants Pardarz. (2012). Development and Urbanization Plan (Comprehensive) of Sabzevar City. [In Persian]
  34. Namini, Ebrahim; Namini, Rouhollah; & Gharbi, Mousa Al-Reza. (2018). Investigating the Impact of Social Exclusion on the Social Security of Residents in Sabzevar City. Social Security Studies, 9(53), 33-62. https://sid.ir/paper/203305/fa [In Persian]
  35. Naeiji, Ghasem. (2014). Designing Urban Deteriorated Textures with a Participatory and Step-by-Step Approach (Case Study: Golestan Neighborhood, Sabzevar), Master’s Thesis in Architecture, Hakim Sabzevari University. [In Persian]
  36. Nasr, Tahereh. (2017). Explaining the Components of Physical Identity in Traditional Iranian Cities. Arman Shahr Architecture and Urbanism, 10(21), 231-246. [In Persian]
  37. Vaezhi, Mehdi; & Alimardani, Masoud. (2018). The Concept of Identity and a Philosophical Approach to Identity and the Nature of the City. Bagh Negar, 15(62), 47-56. doi:10.22034/bagh.2018.66285 [In Persian]
  1. Abdel-Aziz, D., & Shuqair, H.I. (2014). Amman’s Facades Lost between Identity and Veracity; Factors Impacting Facades’ Design. Arts and Design Studies, 26, 20-23.
  2. Ahmed Aly, Sherine Shafik (2011). Modernization and regionalism: Approaches for sustainable revival of local urban identity. Procedia Engineering, 21, 503-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2044.
  3. Alexander, Christofher. (2002). The Timeless Way of Building. New York, United States: Oxford University Press Inc.
  4. Alishah, Majid, Ebrahimi, Abdollah, & Ghaffari, Faezeh. (2016). The role of buildings facades of on urban landscape (Case Study: Old Context of Sari). (Vol. 6). doi:10.7456/1060AGSE/019.
  5. Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002.
  6. Askari, Amir Hossein, & Dola, Kamariah Binti. (2009). Influence of Building Façade Visual Elements on Its Historical Image Influence of Building Façade Visual Elements on Its Historical Image: Case of Kuala Lumpur City, Malaysia (Vol. 5).
  7. Atalan, Özlem. (2016). Continuity of regional identity: A case study of facade elements in traditional Çeþme houses. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 13(2), 121-131. DOI:10.5505/itujfa.2016.49368.
  8. Balasubramanian, R., & Agarwal, D. (2012). Delphi technique--a review. International Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 3(2), 16-26.‏ https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2009.16.2.38892.
  9. Baper, Salahaddin yasin, & Sanusi Hassan, Ahmad (2012). Factors affecting the continuity of architectural identity.
  10. Baris, M.E., Uckac, L. & Uslu, A. (2009). Exploring public perception of urban identity: The case of Ankara, Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4(8), 724-735.
  11. Beauregard, R.A. & Holcomb, H.B. (1981). Revitalizing cities. Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
  12. Ding Shaolian (2016): Impacts of urban renewal on the place identity of local residents – a case study of Sunwenxilu traditional commercial street in Zhongshan City, Guangdong Province, China. Journal of Heritage Tourism. doi:10.1080/1743873X.2016.1242591
  13. Dixon, J., & Durrheim, K. (2004). Dislocating identity: Desegregation and the transformation of place. Journal of environmental psychology, 24(4), 455-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.09.004.
  14. Fathi, M. S., & Heidari, F. (2018). The role of façades in the formation of physical identity in the Iranian cities. Int. J. Hum. Capital Urban Manage, 3(1), 69-80.‏ doi: 10.22034/ijhcum.2018.03.01.008
  15. Ghodrati, Hossein, & Gharbi, Mosareza. (2019). The social construction of identity in the Golestan quarter of Sabzevar: Narrative research of challenges and identity of the Ghorbat community. Romani Studies, 28(2), 263–292. doi:10.3828/rs.2019.04.
  16. Hull, R. Bruce, Lam, Mark, & Vigo, Gabriela. (1994). Place identity: symbols of self in the urban fabric. Landscape and Urban Planning, 28(2), 109-120. doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)90001-9.
  17. Ibrahim, M. A., Wahab, M. H., & Shukri, S. M. (2018). Revealing urban marketplace identity: Pudu. Planning Malaysia, 16.doi:10.21837/pm.v16i5.422.
  18. Kazemi, A. Behzadfar, M. (2013). Recognizing the system of environmental meanings in historical environments with an emphasis on the social changes of the audience. Urban studies Journal, 2 (6): 75-87.
  19. Kaymaz, I. (2013). Urban landscapes and identity. In: Özyavuz, M. (Ed.(. Advances in landscape architecture. Rijeka: InTechOpen, 739-760. doi:10.5772/55754.
  20. Khalili Zonouz, Hassan. (2018). Partitioning (Facade) and Identity in the Historical Context Case of Zonouz City. Journal of Sustainable Development. Vol. 11, No. 6. doi:10.5539/jsd.v11n6p70.
  21. K'oyoo, E. (2023). Use of photo-elicitation interviews to explore urban landscape identity in the context of urban renewal changes, a case of Kisumu City, Kenya. Acta Structilia, 30(2), 35-60.‏ doi: 10.38140/as.v30i2.7477
  22. K'oyoo, E., & Breed, C. (2023). Capturing landscape identity in the context of urban renewal: The case of Kisumu City, Kenya. Town and Regional Planning, 83, 18-32.‏ doi: :10.38140/trp.v83i.7469.
  23. Krier, Léon, Porphyrios, Demetri, Economakis, Richard, & Watkin, David. (1992). Architecture and urban design, 1967-1992. London; New York: Academy Editions ; St. Martins Press.
  24. krier, Rob. (1983). Elements of architecture (Architectural design profile). london: Distributed in the United States of America.
  25. Motamedi Nezhad, M. (2023). Achieving identity maker principles in urban facades. 5th.International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture, Art and Urban Design, Tabriz Islamic Art University.
  26. Oxford. (2005). Oxford advanced learner's dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.
  27. Rapoport, Amos. (1977). Human aspects of urban form : towards a man-environment approach to urban form and design (1st ed. ed.): Oxford : Pergamon press.
  28. Shao, Y., Lange, E., Thwaites, K., Xue, Z., & Xu, X. (2020). Understanding landscape identity in the context of rapid urban change in China. Land, 9(9), 298, 1-18. doi:10.3390/land9090298.
  29. Stedman, Richard. (2002). Toward a Social Psychology of Place. Environment and Behavior, 34, 561-581. doi:10.1177/0013916502034005001.
  30. Thangaratinam, S., & Redman, C. W. (2005). The delphi technique. The obstetrician & gynaecologist, 7(2), 120-125.‏ https://doi.org/10.1576/toag.7.2.120.27071.
  31. Wijaya, B. T. (2019). Visual elements influence at the facade of historical buildings in Jalan Panglima Sudirman corridor Batu, Indonesia. Local Wisdom: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Kearifan Lokal, 11(2). doi: 10.26905/lw.v11i2.3004.
  32. Yousuf, M. I. (2007). Using expertsopinions through Delphi technique. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 12(1).‏