Bibliographic review of factors affecting women's walking in urban spaces

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Art and Architecture Faculty, Persian Gulf University, bushehr, Iran.

2 Master's student, Urban Planning Department, Art and Architecture faculty, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

Abstract
Introduction
Walking has emerged as a highly sustainable mode of transportation that plays a crucial role in enhancing urban livability and reducing environmental degradation. In an age where urban areas are grappling with severe issues such as noise and air pollution, walking offers an eco-friendly alternative to the reliance on private vehicles. This mode of transport not only contributes to environmental sustainability but also offers significant public health benefits. Numerous studies have indicated that walking serves as an effective means of alleviating stress, fostering mental well-being, and promoting physical fitness. It is not merely a physical activity; it is a holistic practice that fosters social connections and encourages community engagement, thereby enriching urban life.
The significance of walking extends beyond its environmental and health benefits. It is a multifaceted activity that encompasses various aspects of social interaction and individual well-being. Walking provides an opportunity for individuals to connect with their surroundings and with one another, creating a sense of community and belonging. The act itself can serve as a platform for socialization, where individuals engage in conversations, share experiences, and build relationships. Consequently, the design and accessibility of urban spaces play a pivotal role in facilitating or hindering walking behaviors among residents.
However, despite its many benefits, certain groups—particularly women—face unique challenges that can impede their walking experiences. Gender-based disparities in urban environments often lead to safety concerns, social restrictions, and infrastructural inadequacies that disproportionately affect women. Recognizing and addressing these barriers is essential for ensuring that all individuals, especially women, have equitable access to walking opportunities and can reap the associated health benefits. In this context, promoting inclusivity and equity in urban planning is vital for fostering environments that support the health and well-being of all community members
 
Methodology
To investigate the current state of research on women’s walking in urban environments, we conducted a comprehensive examination of scholarly articles published in the Scopus citation database between 2014 and 2024. The search utilized specific keywords, including “Walking,” “Walkability,” “Women,” and “Female,” to identify articles relevant to our focus on women’s walking patterns in urban settings. The emphasis on both social sciences and environmental sciences in our review allowed for a multifaceted understanding of the issues at play.
Initially, our search yielded a total of 4,153 articles. To refine this extensive dataset, we implemented a rigorous filtering process. We assessed the relevance of articles based on title and author name, and systematically eliminated those lacking English titles, abstracts, or keywords. Additionally, we excluded titles that were deemed irrelevant to our study focus. This meticulous approach resulted in a final selection of 130 articles, extracted from a diverse array of 76 sources, including academic journals and conference proceedings.
The articles selected for review were analyzed for various metrics, including publication age, citation frequency, and author collaboration rates. The average age of the articles was determined to be 5.4 years, indicating the recency of the research focus. The annual growth rate of published articles was calculated at 5.76%, with an average of 20.72 citations per article. Notably, 21 of the selected articles were authored by a single researcher, while the remaining articles exhibited an average collaboration rate of 3.32 authors, highlighting the collaborative nature of research in this field. The findings reveal a dynamic and growing body of literature focused on women’s walking in urban environments.
Results and Discussion
The analysis of the articles indicated a notable trend in the geographic distribution of the research. The majority of articles were published by authors based in the United States (107 articles), followed by significant contributions from Japan, England, and Australia (29 articles each), and Iran (24 articles). This distribution suggests a concentration of research activity in developed countries, where urban design and policy issues related to walking have garnered significant academic attention.
Among the selected articles, the most frequently published journals included the Journal of Transport and Health and the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. These journals are known for their focus on public health, urban planning, and environmental issues, making them appropriate venues for research on women’s walking behaviors.
In terms of thematic categorization, the studies were grouped into four distinct categories:

Environmental Factors: This category encompasses research examining how physical urban environments, including infrastructure, green spaces, and walkability features, influence women’s walking behaviors. Studies in this area often highlight the importance of well-designed sidewalks, safe crossings, and accessible public spaces.
Safety and Security: Research in this category focuses on how perceptions of safety and security impact women’s willingness to walk in urban areas. This includes examining factors such as crime rates, lighting, and the presence of other pedestrians, which can either encourage or discourage walking.
Sociocultural Factors: This group of studies investigates the sociocultural dynamics that shape women’s walking behaviors, including societal norms, cultural expectations, and gender roles. Understanding these factors is crucial for addressing the barriers women face in accessing walking opportunities.
Gender Comparisons: Some studies explore the differences in walking behaviors between women and men, providing insights into how gender influences walking patterns, motivations, and experiences in urban settings.

The review of the literature revealed that most research has been conducted in developed countries, with a conspicuous gap in studies focusing on developing nations. Given the unique cultural and social contexts of developing countries, there is a pressing need for research that examines the factors affecting women’s walking behaviors in these regions. Insights derived from such studies could inform policy and planning efforts that are more culturally sensitive and tailored to the specific needs of women in diverse urban contexts.
Furthermore, the predominance of cross-sectional studies in the existing literature suggests that longitudinal research is particularly important for understanding the long-term effects of walking on women’s health and the impact of urban design on pedestrianization. Longitudinal studies could provide valuable data on how changes in urban environments influence walking behaviors over time and the subsequent effects on health outcomes.
Another significant finding is the variability in research methodologies. While some studies have adopted qualitative approaches to explore women’s lived experiences, others have employed quantitative methods to analyze walking patterns and behaviors. A mixed-methods approach, integrating both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, could yield a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing women’s walking behaviors and experiences.
Conclusion
  The findings of this study not only identify current research trends and gaps in the literature on women’s walking in urban environments but also offer a foundation for developing integrated theoretical frameworks. This framework can inform policymaking aimed at creating urban spaces that cater to the unique needs of women. Addressing the barriers women encounter in accessing walking opportunities is essential for fostering environments that promote health, well-being, and social equity.
By enhancing the inclusivity of urban design and planning, policymakers can help create urban communities where all individuals can thrive. Such efforts can contribute to a more sustainable urban future, where walking is not only a viable mode of transportation but also a pathway to improved health outcomes, enhanced social connections, and greater community cohesion. Ultimately, the promotion of walking as a fundamental component of urban life is essential for building vibrant, resilient, and inclusive urban environments. Through targeted research and informed policy interventions, it is possible to realize the transformative potential of walking in urban areas, ensuring that all individuals, particularly women, can fully participate in and benefit from the rich tapestry of urban life.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Abdous, H., & Mahmoudabadi, A. (2018). PW 0580 Vulnerability of female pedestrians in different crash locations, a case-study for iran. Abstracts, A54.2-A54. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprevention-2018-safety.147
  2. Adeel, M., Yeh, A. G. O., & Zhang, F. (2017). Gender inequality in mobility and mode choice in Pakistan. Transportation, 44(6), 1519–1534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9712-8
  3. Almahmood, M., Scharnhorst, E., Carstensen, T. A., Jørgensen, G., & Schulze, O. (2017). Mapping the gendered city: Investigating the socio-cultural influence on the practice of walking and the meaning of walkscapes among young Saudi adults in Riyadh. Journal of Urban Design, 22(2), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1273742
  4. Anciaes, P. R., & Jones, P. (2018). Estimating preferences for different types of pedestrian crossing facilities. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 52, 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.025
  5. Anneroth, E. (2024). Renovating Marginalised Urban Areas with Girls and Young Women: A Case Study from Sweden. The Journal of Public Space, 9(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.32891/jps.v9i1.1811
  6. Badawi, S., & Farag, A. A. (2021). Young Saudi Women’s travel behavior change over 2015/2020. Journal of Transport & Health, 21, 101080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101080
  7. Bahendwa, F. (2017). Relevance of Walking and Informal Activities in Urban Space: A Case of Dar es Salaam City, Tanzania. Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(4), 43. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v10n4p43
  8. Balpande, M., & Siddiqui, S. (2022). Effect of walking exercise on the human body. International Journal of Health Sciences, 8783–8787. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS1.6977
  9. Basu, N., Haque, M. M., King, M., Kamruzzaman, M., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2021). The unequal gender effects of the suburban built environment on perceptions of security. Journal of Transport & Health, 23, 101243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101243
  10. Basu, N., Oviedo-Trespalacios, O., King, M., Kamruzzaman, Md., & Haque, Md. M. (2023). What do pedestrians consider when choosing a route? The role of safety, security, and attractiveness perceptions and the built environment during day and night walking. Cities, 143, 104551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104551
  11. Benton, D. C. (2017). Using bibliometrics to support revalidation requirements. Nursing Standard, 32(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2017.e10589
  12. Blakeman, K. (2018). Bibliometrics in a Digital Age: Help or Hindrance. Science Progress, 101(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.3184/003685018X15337564592469
  13. Buehler, R., Pucher, J., & Bauman, A. (2020). Physical activity from walking and cycling for daily travel in the United States, 2001–2017: Demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic variation. Journal of Transport&Health, 16, 100811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.100811
  14. Chen, S. ‐Y., & Wu, J. ‐T. (2017). Global productivity of dermatological research: A bibliometric analysis from 1985 to 2014. British Journal of Dermatology, 176(1), 234–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14802
  15. Clark, B., Chatterjee, K., Martin, A., & Davis, A. (2020). How commuting affects subjective wellbeing. Transportation, 47(6), 2777–2805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-09983-9
  16. De Sousa, M. N. A., Almeida, E. P. D. O., & Bezerra, A. L. D. (2024). Bibliometrics: What is it? What is it used for? And how to do it? Cuadernos de Educación y Desarrollo, 16(2), e3042. https://doi.org/10.55905/cuadv16n2-021
  17. Dubey, S., Bailey, A., & Lee, J. (Brian). (2025). Women’s perceived safety in public places and public transport: A narrative review of contributing factors and measurement methods. Cities, 156, 105534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105534
  18. Golan, Y., Wilkinson, N., Henderson, J. M., & Weverka, A. (2019). Gendered walkability: Building a daytime walkability index for women. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2019.1472
  19. Hassan, D. K., & Elkhateeb, A. (2021). Walking experience: Exploring the trilateral interrelation of walkability, temporal perception, and urban ambiance. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 10(3), 516–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.02.004
  20. Herrmann-Lunecke, M. G., Mora, R., & Sagaris, L. (2020). Persistence of walking in Chile: Lessons for urban sustainability. Transport Reviews, 40(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1712494
  21. Huang, M.-L., & Chen, M.-C. (2025). Effectiveness of Walking Exercise in Improving Physical Fitness and Depression in Patients With Schizophrenia. Biological Research For Nursing, 27(2), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004241290526
  22. Jakubowska, K., Jerzak, A., Janocha, A., & Ziemba, P. (2024). The impact of physical activity on mental disorders. Quality in Sport, 18, 53286. https://doi.org/10.12775/qs.2024.18.53286
  23. K Pradeep, Jisha Vg, Baiju Paul, & Paul T Benziker. (2024). Gendered Space and Spatial Discourses in Everyday Life: Exploring The Notion of Henri Lefebvre. International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering and Management (IRJAEM), 2(11), 3273–3281. https://doi.org/10.47392/irjaem.2024.0482
  24. Kim, Y., Yeo, H., & Lim, L. (2024). Sustainable, walkable cities for the elderly: Identification of the built environment for walkability by activity purpose. Sustainable Cities and Society, 100, 105004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105004
  25. Lak, A., Aghamolaei, R., & Myint, P. K. (2020). How Do Older Women Perceive their Safety in Iranian Urban Outdoor Environments? Ageing International, 45(4), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-020-09398-3
  26. Lizárraga, C., Castillo-Pérez, I., Martín-Blanco, C., & Grindlay, A. L. (2024). Influencia del entorno construido en la percepción de inseguridad y en la preferencia por caminar desde una perspectiva de género. Ciudad y Territorio Estudios Territoriales, 56(220). https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2024.220.4
  27. Ma, J., Lin, P., & Williams, J. (2024). Effectiveness of nature-based walking interventions in improving mental health in adults: A systematic review. Current Psychology, 43(11), 9521–9539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05112-z
  28. Marquet, O., & Miralles-Guasch, C. (2015). Neighbourhood vitality and physical activity among the elderly: The role of walkable environments on active ageing in Barcelona, Spain. Social Science & Medicine, 135, 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.016
  29. Mazzulla, G., Eboli, L., & Forciniti, C. (2024). Do women perceive pedestrian path attractiveness differently from men? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 179, 103890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103890
  30. Nagata, S., Nakaya, T., Hanibuchi, T., Amagasa, S., Kikuchi, H., & Inoue, S. (2020). Objective scoring of streetscape walkability related to leisure walking: Statistical modeling approach with semantic segmentation of Google Street View images. Health & Place, 66, 102428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102428
  31. Neale, C., Hoffman, J., Jefferson, D., Gohlke, J., Boukhechba, M., Mondschein, A., Wang, S., & Roe, J. (2022). The impact of urban walking on psychophysiological wellbeing. Cities & Health, 6(6), 1053–1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2022.2123763
  32. Ortiz, C., Franco Calderon, A. M., Millan Franco, G., & Jaramillo Diaz, I. (2025). Spatialising intersectionality: An approach to public space design in self-built neighbourhoods in Cali, Colombia. URBAN DESIGN International. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-024-00267-y
  33. Paydar, M., Kamani-Fard, A., & Etminani-Ghasrodashti, R. (2017). Perceived security of women in relation to their path choice toward sustainable neighborhood in Santiago, Chile. Cities, 60, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.002
  34. Plaut, P., Shach-Pinsly, D., Schreuer, N., & Kizony, R. (2021). The reflection of the fear of falls and risk of falling in walking activity spaces of older adults in various urban environments. Journal of Transport Geography, 95, 103152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103152
  35. Pollard, T. M., & Wagnild, J. M. (2017). Gender differences in walking (for leisure, transport and in total) across adult life: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 341. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4253-4
  36. Priori Saenz, M., Aguirre, J., & Roitman, A. (2025, January). URBANISMO FEMINISTA Y DERECHO A LA CIUDAD. Seminario Internacional de Investigación En Urbanismo. Seminario Internacional de Investigación en Urbanismo. https://doi.org/10.5821/siiu.12854
  37. Rodríguez, D. A., Merlin, L., Prato, C. G., Conway, T. L., Cohen, D., Elder, J. P., Evenson, K. R., McKenzie, T. L., Pickrel, J. L., & Veblen-Mortenson, S. (2015). Influence of the Built Environment on Pedestrian Route Choices of Adolescent Girls. Environment and Behavior, 47(4), 359–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513520004
  38. Roy, S., Bailey, A., & Van Noorloos, F. (2024). Understanding the barriers affecting women’s mobility in the first- and last-mile stretches in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Journal of Transport Geography, 121, 104036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104036
  39. Sadeghi, A. R., & Jangjoo, S. (2022). Women’s preferences and urban space: Relationship between built environment and women’s presence in urban public spaces in Iran. Cities, 126, 103694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103694
  40. Sadeghi, O., & Di Marzo Serugendo, G. (2024). Assessing Walkability in Urban Environments: A Comprehensive Overview. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202412.0689.v1
  41. Saputro, D. R. S., Prasetyo, H., Wibowo, A., Khairina, F., Sidiq, K., & Wibowo, G. N. A. (2023). BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF NEURAL BASIS EXPANSION ANALYSIS FOR INTERPRETABLE TIME SERIES (N-BEATS) FOR RESEARCH TREND MAPPING. BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika Dan Terapan, 17(2), 1103–1112. https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol17iss2pp1103-1112
  42. Scarponi, L., Abdelfattah, L., Gorrini, A., Valenzuela Cortés, C., Carpentieri, G., Guida, C., Zucaro, F., Andreola, F., Muzzonigro, A., Da Re, L., Gargiulo, E., Cañas, C., Walker, J., & Choubassi, R. (2023). Thematic Review on Women’s Perception of Safety While Walking in Public Space: The STEP UP Project. Sustainability, 15(21), 15636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115636
  43. Setorwofia, A. E., Nana Otoo, J. E., Arko, E. A., Adjakloe, Y. A., & Ojo, T. K. (2020). Self-reported pedestrian knowledge of safety by school children in cape coast metropolis, Ghana. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 8(1), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2020.1758203
  44. Shaer, A., Rezaei, M., & Moghani Rahimi, B. (2023). Assessing the COVID-19 outbreak effects on active mobility of men in comparison with women. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 16(4), 480–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2021.1995028
  45. Shi, Y., Shamsul Harumain, Y. A., & Mohidin, H. H. B. (2023). EXPLORING GENDERED WALKING BEHAVIOR AND ENVIRONMENT PERCEPTION IN HERITAGE CITY: THE CASE OF GULANGYU, CHINA. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 21. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i30.1406
  46. Simonsick, E. M., Guralnik, J. M., & Fried, L. P. (1999). Who Walks? Factors Associated with Walking Behavior in Disabled Older Women With and Without Self‐Reported Walking Difficulty. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47(6), 672–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01588.x
  47. Siqueira Junior, J. D. A., Lopes, A. A. D. S., Godtsfriedt, C. E. S., Justina, M. D. D., Paiva, K. M. D., d’Orsi, E., & Rech, C. R. (2022). Neighbourhood walkability and mental health in older adults: A cross-sectional analysis from EpiFloripa Aging Study. Frontiers in Aging, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2022.915292
  48. Son, W.-H., Park, H.-T., Jeon, B. H., & Ha, M.-S. (2023). Moderate intensity walking exercises reduce the body mass index and vascular inflammatory factors in postmenopausal women with obesity: A randomized controlled trial. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47403-2
  49. Suresh, S., & Parashar, A. (2024). Calibrating Urban Livability in the Global South.
  50. UN Habitat. (2022). Cities for girls;Cities for all.
  51. Ungvari, Z., Fazekas-Pongor, V., Csiszar, A., & Kunutsor, S. K. (2023). The multifaceted benefits of walking for healthy aging: From Blue Zones to molecular mechanisms. GeroScience, 45(6), 3211–3239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-023-00873-8
  52. Walsh, A., & Simpson, E. E. A. (2020). Health cognitions mediate physical (in)activity and walking in midlife women. Maturitas, 131, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.10.005
  53. Warren, S. (2017). Pluralising the walking interview: Researching (im)mobilities with Muslim women. Social & Cultural Geography, 18(6), 786–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1228113
  54. (2018). Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: More active people for a healthier world.
  55. World Bank. (2020). Sustainable Mobility for All: A Global Roadmap for Action.
  56. Zysk, E. (2024). Identification of Determinants That Reduce Women’s Safety and Comfort in Urban Public Spaces (UPS). Sustainability, 16(22), 10075. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210075