"Explaining the correlation of the effective components of urban graphics on enhancing the sense of place among the citizens of Rasht."

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of of Urban Planning, ،faculty of art and Architecture ، University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

2 Master's student in Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Rural Planning and Geomorphology, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

10.22034/jspr.2026.2075669.1196
Abstract
1. Problem Statement
The contemporary urban landscape faces significant challenges in creating meaningful and sustainable spaces that foster a deep sense of belonging among citizens. This research addresses this fundamental issue through the lens of Rasht City, the largest and most populous urban center in northern Iran. Despite its rich cultural heritage and distinct identity, Rasht grapples with considerable deficiencies in its urban graphic design. The core problem lies in the presence of visual elements that are incompatible with the local cultural fabric, leading to public space confusion, diminished social interactions, and a weak expression of visual identity. These issues not only erode the sense of place attachment but also fundamentally hinder the creation of sustainable and meaningful urban environments. The absence of a coherent, multi-dimensional strategy for urban graphics has resulted in a scenario where their potential as a key factor in shaping the urban experience remains largely untapped. Consequently, this study positions itself to redefine the role of urban graphics, moving beyond their mere functional purpose, and investigates their capacity as a significant influencer in enhancing the sense of place. The primary research questions guiding this inquiry are: A) How do urban graphics influence the enhancement of the sense of place in Rasht’s urban spaces? B) Which dimensions of urban graphics have the most substantial impact on this enhancement?
Keywords: Urban Graphics, Enhancement of Sense of Place, Urban Space, Statistical Ranking Analysis, Rasht City

2. Research Methodology
This study employs a descriptive-analytical and survey-based research methodology. The theoretical foundations of urban graphics and sense of place were first established through an extensive review of relevant literature. From this, urban graphics were conceptualized as a multi-dimensional construct comprising six distinct dimensions: Functional, Semantic, Social, Psychological, Economic, and Environmental. A researcher-made questionnaire was developed to measure citizens’ perceptions of these dimensions and their relationship with the sense of place. The statistical population consisted of citizens over 18 years old in Rasht. Using Cochran’s formula, a sample size of 383 individuals was determined, and stratified random sampling was employed for data collection.
The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed through content validity, verified by a panel of urban planning and design experts. Its reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, which yielded a satisfactory coefficient of 0.706, indicating acceptable internal consistency. The collected data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Descriptive analysis (mean, standard deviation, skewness) provided an overview of the data distribution for each component. To examine the relationships between the different dimensions and the sense of place, Spearman’s correlation test was utilized. The core of the inferential analysis involved the application of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). This advanced technique allowed for the simultaneous analysis of causal relationships between the multiple latent variables (the six dimensions) and the dependent variable (sense of place). The significance of the path coefficients within the SEM model was rigorously tested using a bootstrapping procedure to ensure the robustness and statistical significance of the findings.

3. Findings and Conclusion
The descriptive findings revealed a varied performance of urban graphics across different dimensions in Rasht. The Functional dimension recorded the highest mean score (3.86), indicating its perceived strength, particularly in wayfinding and guiding citizens to important locations. The Semantic dimension followed with a mean of 3.09, suggesting a moderate success in reflecting cultural identity. In contrast, the Environmental (2.07), Psychological (2.49), Social (2.71), and Economic (2.76) dimensions were rated significantly lower, highlighting critical areas of weakness, especially concerning visual pollution, psychological stress, and weak social and economic linkages.
However, the causal analysis via PLS-SEM provided a more nuanced and strategic prioritization. The model demonstrated that all six dimensions had a direct, positive, and statistically significant impact on the sense of place. Remarkably, the model’s explanatory power (R² = 0.996) indicated that these six dimensions collectively explain 99.6% of the variance in the sense of place. The path coefficients (β) revealed the order of impact: the Environmental dimension (β = 0.333) emerged as the strongest predictor, followed by the Semantic (β = 0.315), Functional (β = 0.304), Social (β = 0.299), Economic (β = 0.298), and Psychological (β = 0.296) dimensions. The bootstrapping results (all t-statistics > 1.96) conclusively confirmed the significance of all paths. Key factor loadings further identified “reducing visual pollution” (0.864) in the Environmental dimension and “compatibility with historical and cultural values” (0.779) in the Semantic dimension as the most critical components.
In conclusion, while Rasht’s urban graphics are functionally effective, they currently operate more as a “wayfinding tool” than as a holistic “builder of place attachment, tranquility, and environmental sustainability.” The study concludes that for a qualitative enhancement of the sense of place in Rasht, urban graphics must be redefined within a comprehensive, multi-dimensional strategy. This strategy must prioritize environmental sustainability (combating visual pollution and using eco-friendly materials), deeply integrate cultural identity with economic development (using graphics for storytelling and targeted tourism), and consciously design for social interaction and psychological well-being. This paradigm shift requires integrated urban governance to transform urban graphics from a mere functional system into a cohesive “soft infrastructure” that weaves together the environmental, cultural, social, and economic fabric of Rasht, ultimately fostering a profound and sustainable sense of place among its citizens.

Keywords

Subjects

 
1.       آقاجانی، امیرحسین. (1401). تحلیلی در مورد گرافیک محیطی و لزوم پیاده‌سازی صحیح آن منطبق با فرهنگ ملی و تأثیرات مثبت آن در رابطه با جامعه‌ای شاداب و امیدوار. فرهنگ و هنر اسلامی، 1(2)، 105-86. https://civilica.com/doc/1560605
2.       اسلامی، شیرین، و شاهیوندی، احمد. (1402). سنجش شاخص‌های خلق حس مکان در توسعۀ‌های جدید شهری نمونۀ مورد مطالعه: شهرک قدس قم. مطالعات شهری، 12(47)، 64-51. https://doi.org/10.34785/J011.2022.018
3.       پور موسوی، سیدنادر، جمشیدی شیخی‌آبادی، آرزو، و لرزنگنه، مجتبی. (1402). کاربست اصول نوشهرگرایی و حس مکان در بازآفرینی محلۀ آبشوران کرمانشاه. مطالعات ساختار و کارکرد شهری، 10(34)، 215-179. https://doi.org/10.22080/usfs.2023.23886.2273
4.       تیموریان، کتایون، اثنی عشری، سید مانی، و علی‌پور، شهره. (1400). نقش مولفۀ‌های موثر بر کیفیت بصری گرافیک محیطی در توسعۀ فضاهای عمومی (مورد مطالعه: منطقۀ یک تهران). مدیریت شهری، 13(45)، 70-60. https://sid.ir/paper/410098/fa
5.       صیاد، امیرحسین، غریب‌پور، افرا، و دلشاد سیاهکلی، مهسا. (1400). شناسایی و تحلیل عوامل مؤثر در شکل‌گیری حس مکانی در فضاهای عمومی شهری (مطالعۀ موردی: فرهنگسرای نیاوران، موزۀ هنرهای معاصر، تئاتر شهر). جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، 11(2)، 443-427. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22286462.1400.11.2.22.2
6.       حبیب‌زادۀ کوزه کنانی، سیدجواد، عبدالله‌زاده طرف، اکبر، ستاری ساربانقلی، حسن، و پاکدل فرد، محمدرضا. (1401). تحلیلی بر عوامل تبیین‌کنندۀ حس مکان در بافت‌های تاریخی (موردپژوهی: شهر تبریز). معماری و شهرسازی پایدار، 10(2)، 108-95. DOI:10.22061/jsaud.2022.8440.1969
7.       دانشگر، فهیمه، و طاهری، مونا. (1400). «بررسی کیفیت‌های مؤثر بر اثربخشی رنگ در بیلبوردها و عرشه‌های پل شهری تهران (1396-1394)». پژوهشنامۀ گرافیک و نقاشی، 4(6)، 55-43. https://civilica.com/doc/1591559/ : Doi
8.       رضایی، فرامرز، چیتساز، محمدعلی، و بهیان، شاپور. (۱۴۰۱). بررسی گرافیک شهری با مباحث اجتماعی و اقتصادی و تأثیر آن بر بیتفاوتی سیاسی شهروندان. مطالعات هنر اسلامی. 19(45)، 258-239. DOI: 10.22034/ias.2020.251689.1375
9.       صداقتی، عاطفه، و اسحاق‌زاده، هانیه. (1401). روایتگری متن و تصویر و اعتلای هویت شهری با تأکید بر کاربرد ابزارهای گرافیکی (مطالعۀ موردی: مرکز شهر بجنورد). دوفصلنامۀ علمی دانشگاه الزهرا(س). پژوهشنامۀ گرافیک نقاشی، 5(9)، 121-106. https://doi.org/10.22051/pgr.2023.41946.1192
10.   صلواتی، مرجان، اکوان، محمد، گودرزپروری، پرناز، و خزایی، محمد. (1401). معناداری مؤلفه‌های شباهت و تفاوت در بیان هویت و تأثیرگذاری آن در گرافیک شهری. رهپویۀ هنر/هنرهای تجسمی. 4(5). صص 84-73.
11.   عابدوست، حسین. (۱۴۰۰). معنای حسی نوشتار در فضای شهری (نمونۀ موردی شهر رشت). دانش شهرسازی، ۵(۱)، 45-23. Doi: 10.22124/upk.2021.17729.1573
12.   کریمی، نرگس، حبیب، فرح، و اعتصام، ایرج. (1400). نقش نشانه‌های فضاهای شهری در ارتقای حس تعلق به مکان (مطالعۀ موردی: محلات شهر زنجان). شهر پایدار، 4(2). 72-57. DOI: 10.22034/jsc.2021.269967.1401
13.   محمدی ایرلو، نسرین، و حیدر نتاج، وحید. (1403). مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار بر حس مکان و هویت از منظر شهروندان (مطالعۀ موردی: پیاده‌راه عالی‌قاپو اردبیل). مطالعات ساختار و کارکرد شهری، 11(41). 54-33. https://doi.org/10.22080/usfs.2024.26709.2416
14.   نصیری هنده‌خاله، اسماعیل، احمدی، حسن، محققپور، سیده یاسمن، و اسمعیلی، فضل اله. (1401). تحلیل عملکرد مدیریت شهری بر دسترسی شهروندان به خدمات رفاه اجتماعی (مطالعۀ موردی: محلات منطقۀ 18 شهر تهران)، آمایش جغرافیایی فضا، 12(4)، 95-75. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2021.256745.3328
 
15.   Arefi, M. & Aelbrecht, P. (2022). Urban identity, perception, and urban design. URBAN DESIGN International. 27(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-022-00179-9.
16.   Aelbrecht, P. Arefi, M.(2024). What is new in Placemaking research and practice?. URBAN DESIGN International. 29(1),1–3. DOI:10.1057/s41289-024-00241-8.
17.   Askarizad, R. Rezaei Liapee, S. & Mohajer, M. (2021). The Role of Sense of Be-longing to the Architectural Sym-bolic Elements on Promoting Social Participation in Students within Educational Settings. Space Ontol-ogy International Journal, 10(4), 1- 18. DOI:10.22094/SOIJ.2021.1930154.1419.
18.   Basiri, M. ZeynaliAzim, A. & Azar, A. (2021). Analysis of Factors and Components of the Sense of Belonging to Place in the Old Neighborhoods of Tabriz City (Case Study of Ahrab Neighborhood of Tabriz). Urban Planning Knowledge, 5(3), 107-125. DOI: 10.22124/upk.2021.16220.1441
19.   Collins-Kreiner, N. (2020). Hiking, sense of place, and place attachment in the age of globalization and digitization: the Israeli case. Sustainability, 12(11), 4548. https://doi. org/10.3390/su12114548
20.   Chen, N. C., Hall, C. M., & Prayag, G. (2021). Sense of place and place attachment in tourism. Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780429279089
21.   Cardoso, A., Pereira, M. S., Sousa, B. B., Poladashvili, T., & Faria, S. (2023). Attachment Theory and Sense of Place for Visitors to Kazbegi National Park. In International Conference on Tourism, Technology and Systems, 321 328. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9765-7_28
22.   Dameria, C. Akbar, R. Indradjati, P. N. & Tjokropandojo, D. S. (2020). A conceptual framework for understanding sense of place dimensions in the heritage context. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 31(2), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.5614/jpwk.2020.31.2.3
23.   Gottwald, Sarah. (2022). Sense of Place in Spatial Planning: Applying Instrumental and Deliderative Approaches at the River Lahn, Landscape Online, volume,97. https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.2022.1100
24.   Grimshaw, L. & Mates, L. (2022). Its Part of our Community, Where We Live: Urban Heritage and Childrens Sense of Place, Urban Studies Journal Limited. Urban Studies 59(4):004209802110195. DOI:10.1177/00420980211019597.
25.   Ganoti, R. & Laskari, I. (2023). The importance of Environmental Graphic Design in urban spaces. E3S Web of Conferences 436(10). DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/202343612013.
26.   Hemmati Vineh, M. Khazaie, M. & Hatam, G. (2021). The Application of Contemporary Interactive Graphics in the Cities through Studying “John Fiske” Theories (Approach: Environmental Development Culture)”. Theoretical Principles of Visual Arts, 5(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.22051/jtpva.2021.33073.1234.
27.   Hanks, L. Zhang, L. & Line, N. (2020). Perceived similarity in third places: Understanding the effect of place attachment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86(3), 102455. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102455.
28.   Khemri, M. Y., Melis, A., & Caputo, S. (2020). Sustaining the Liveliness of Public Spaces in El Houma through Placemaking. The Case of Algiers. The Journal of Public Space, 5(1), 129-152. DOI:10.32891/jps.v5i1.1254.
29.   Karami, I. Basiri, M. & Zeynali Azim, A. (2021). Analysis of place attachment and related variables in third urban locations (Case study: Elgoli Park of Tabriz). Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 9(3), 735-759. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2021.318070.1450.
30.   Liu, X. Zhang, J. Zhou, Z. & Feng, Z. (2023). Investigating the Impact of Environmental Graphics on Local Culture in Sustainable Rural Cultural Tourism Spaces”. Sustainability, 15(13), 10207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310207.
31.   Lewicka, M. Wnuk, A. Prusik, M. Toruńczyk-Ruiz, S. Iwańczak, B., Oleksy, T. & Kula, A. M. (2023). Essentialist and anti-essentialist meanings of place: A new scale and implications for place attachment and openness to outgroups. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 88 (2), 102030. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102030
32.   Petković, G. Pasanec Preprotić, S. & Kozjan Cindrić, A. (2025). Experiential Graphic Design: Informing, Inspiring, and Integrating People in Physical Spaces—A Review. Buildings, 15(11), 1862. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111862
33.   Raisi Ghanavati, S. Moghli, M. & Afifi, M. E. (2022). Investigating the role of urban furniture in improving the quality of the urban environment (case example: Bandar Abbas city)”. Applied Research of Geographical Sciences, 23(71), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.61186/jgs.23.71.167.
34.   Rajala, Kiandra. G. Sorice, Michael. A. Thomas, Valerie. (2020). The meaning(s) of place: Identifying the structure of sense of place across a social–ecological landscape. People and Nature, 2(3): 718–733. DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10112.
35.   Tansukanun, P. (2022). Sustainability through the place-making process: Lamphun old town inhabitants’ sense of place. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 10(2), 148-167. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.10.2_148
36.   Timourian, K. Ziviar, P. & Ezni-Ashri, S. (2021). Evaluation of the performance of urban furniture in improving the quality of environmental graphics (case study: Sadeghieh neighborhood of Tehran)”. Urban and Regional Policy, 1(2), 52–65. https://journals.iau.ir/article_691443_3561f3a54f277b8b45b04e406fde91a4.pdf
37.   Westerholt, R. Acedo, A. & Naranjo-Zolotov, M. (2022). Exploring sense of place in relation to urban facilities–evidence from Lisbon. Cities, 127, 103750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103750
38.   Zeynali Azim, A., Babazadeh Oskouei, S., & Noorizadeh, Z. (2022). Measuring satisfaction of sidewalk services as an urban space with the help of factor analysis methods and structural equations (case study: Valiasr sidewalk in Tabriz). Sustainable Urban Development, 3(7), 101-121. DOI:10.22034/usd.2022.700745
39.   Zhou, J., & Ujang, N. (2024). An Analysis of Pedestrian Preferences for Wayfinding Signage in Urban Settings: Evidence from Nanning, China. Buildings, 14(9), 2986. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092986
 

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 31 August 2026

  • Receive Date 24 October 2025
  • Revise Date 01 August 2026
  • Accept Date 31 August 2026