Revisiting Historical Collective Spaces: A Framework for Enhancing the Design Principles of Multi-functional Urban Spaces (Case Study: Isfahan City)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Master Student, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Shahid Ashrafi Isfahani University, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Assistant professor, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Shahid Ashrafi Isfahani University, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract
Introduction
 Public spaces have always been fundamental to the urban fabric, acting as physical venues for social interactions and enduring symbols of cultural and social identity. Across civilizations, such spaces have provided a sense of continuity, reflecting their societies' values, priorities, and aspirations. In Iranian architecture, public spaces such as squares, markets, mosques, and gardens hold particular importance. These spaces were thoughtfully designed over various historical periods to address a spectrum of needs, from facilitating trade and social gatherings to fostering spiritual and recreational experiences. Their defining features include a focus on human scale, climate-appropriate designs, and a deep respect for the social, cultural, and economic contexts in which they were embedded.
In contemporary times, the rapid pace of urbanization, changing lifestyles, and evolving societal values have transformed the role and expectations of public spaces. Once primarily centered on singular or localized functions, modern public spaces are expected to address a broader and more diverse array of needs. They must accommodate the demands of dense urban living, provide platforms for cultural expression and community engagement, and adapt to changing mobility and technology use patterns. Designing multifunctional spaces that cater to these diverse requirements has become a challenge and a necessity in urban planning and architecture.
Beyond merely fulfilling physical needs, contemporary public spaces must also foster a sense of connection among citizens and between individuals and their environment. They should provide opportunities for social interactions, encourage recreation, and strengthen the sense of belonging and identity within urban communities. These spaces can unite, bridging generational and cultural divides while promoting inclusivity and accessibility for all societal groups.
This research investigates the successful attributes of traditional public spaces in Iran, uncovering their enduring relevance in today's urban contexts. By analyzing principles such as human-centered design, multifunctionality, and integration with cultural and historical values, the study proposes guidelines for creating contemporary public spaces. While addressing the practical needs of modern society, these spaces must also serve as custodians of cultural heritage, ensuring that the identity and legacy of their communities endure amidst the dynamism of urban evolution.
 Methodology
This research employs a historical-evolutionary method combined with a qualitative approach. Historical documents and sources related to Iranian architecture and urban planning during the Ilkhanid, Timurid, Safavid, and Qajar periods were analyzed in the initial stage. These periods were selected for their profound influence on the development of public spaces. Content analysis of these historical sources focused on uncovering the spaces' architectural, social, and cultural characteristics.
In the second stage, field studies were conducted in Isfahan, examining locations such as Shahid Rajai Parks, Nazhvan, Mardavij, Khaju Bridge, Si-o-Se Pol Bridge, Shahrestan Bridge, and the Metropol Complex on Chaharbagh Street. Citizen interviews and direct observations of how these spaces are utilized provided insight into contemporary needs and expectations. Finally, the data were synthesized using comparative analysis to propose design solutions tailored to modern multifunctional spaces.
Conclusion
 This research analyzes successful historical collective space design principles and adapts them to contemporary needs, yielding valuable insights. Key findings include:
Contemporary Markets: Modern markets should integrate public and private spaces to facilitate social and commercial interactions.
Squares as Cultural Hubs: Public squares must be designed for cultural, educational, and recreational activities and serve as venues for community engagement.
Gardens as Educational Centers: Green spaces should incorporate educational and cultural elements alongside recreational uses.
Cultural Identity in Design: Emphasizing local cultural identity in public spaces can enhance community attachment and collective identity.
Overall, applying successful historical patterns to contemporary design can improve urban life quality and create spaces that address citizens' cultural, social, and psychological needs.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Haghighi Boroujeni, Samar, & Rahro-Paydar, Sanaz. (2020). Metamorphosis in Iranian Public Spaces until the End of the Safavid Era. Journal of the History of Islamic Civilization, 53(2), 367-398. https://doi.org/10.22059/JHIC.2021.307406.654165 [In Persian]
  2. Mahmoudi Nejad, Hadi. (2009). Space and Place in Urban Design. Tehran: Holeh Publications. [In Persian]
  3. Ghafouri, Atiyeh. (2020). Participation: The Basis of Designing Multi-Functional Urban Spaces. Manzar, 12(53), 26-39. Doi:10.22034/manzar.2020.242655.2080 [In Persian]
  1. Shamseddin Tekyeh, Seyed Mohsen, Eghbali, Naser, & Shieh, Esmaeil. (2019). Evaluating the Components Affecting the Creation of Sociable Multi-Functional Spaces in Urban Areas with a Local-Global Approach (Case Study: Tehran Municipality District 22). New Attitudes in Human Geography (Human Geography), 11(2), 1-14. https://journals.iau.ir/article_663705.html [In Persian]
  1. Ghafouri, Atiyeh, & Weber, Christian. (2020). Multi-Functional Urban Spaces: Principles for Improving the Quality of Urban Life in Dense Cities. Manzar, 12(51), 36-47. Doi: 10.22034/manzar.2020.214183.2023 [In Persian]
  1. Ghorbani Param, Afshin. (2023). Designing Multi-Functional Urban Spaces with the Approach of Increasing Social Interactions and Environmental Protection in District 22 of Tehran. Journal of Environmental Science Studies, 8(4), 7284-7294. Doi: 10.22034/jess.2023.390751.1992 [In Persian]
  1. Hillenbrand, Robert. (2010). Islamic Architecture: Form, Function, and Meaning (Baqer Ayatollahzadeh Shirazi, Trans.). (5th ed.). Rozaneh, 101-103. [In Persian]
  2. Esmaildokht, Maryam, & Esmaildokht, Mohammadreza. (2021). Phenomenology of the Concept of Neighborhood with Emphasis on the Neighborhoods of Shiraz during the Qajar Period. Culture Tourism, 2(7), 33-42. Doi: 10.22034/toc.2022.323845.1069 [In Persian]
  1. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.
  2. Asadi, S. (2023). Power discourse: reflecting Shah Abbas I’s political thoughts on Safavid architecture and urban development (Isfahan’s Baghshahr Utopia).Arts & Humanities Open Access Journal. https://doi.org/10.15406/ahoaj.2023.05.00184.
  3. Belmeziti, A., Cherqui, F., & Kaufmann, B. (2018). Improving the multi-functionality of urban green spaces: Relations between components of green spaces and urban services.Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2018.07.014.
  4. Benisi, T., & Zarezadeh, F. (2019). EXAMINING THE ORIGIN OF FLOWERPOT MOTIFS IN THE BUILDINGS OF QAJAR ERA.The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLII-2-W11-231-2019.
  5. Benacer, H., Golkar, N., & Aouissi, K. (2022). Public spaces as a palimpsest of city layers: The case of Baharestan Square in Tehran (Iran).Journal of the Geographical Institute Jovan Cvijic, SASA. https://doi.org/10.2298/ijgi2203341b.
  6. Bondarabady, H., & Khavarian-Garmsir, A. (2019). An analyses of the role of socio-economic classes in the spatial organization (a case study of Yazd, Iran).Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JASREP.2019.04.021.
  7. Bryce, D., O'Gorman, K., & Baxter, I. (2013). Commerce, empire and faith in Safavid Iran: the caravanserai of Isfahan.International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25, 204-226. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596111311301603.
  8. Dennis, M., & James, P. (2017). Ecosystem services of collectively managed urban gardens : exploring factors affecting synergies and trade-offs at the site level.Ecosystem services, 26, 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSER.2017.05.009.
  9. Ebrahim, A., Karim, H., & Reza, R. (2022). Study of Safavid buildings Decorations (With sample survey of the Cheshme Emarat and Behshahr Baghshah).Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/47/20.
  10. Emami, F. (2016). Coffeehouses, Urban Spaces, and the Formation of a Public Sphere in Safavid Isfahan., 33, 177-220. https://doi.org/10.1163/22118993_03301P008.
  11. Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books. DOI:10.2307/3552294
  12. Gallent, N., Shoard, M., Andersson, J., Oades, R., & Tudor, C. (2004). Inspiring England's urban fringes: multi-functionality and planning.Local Environment, 9, 217 - 233. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354983042000219342.
  13. Ghafouri, A., & Weber, C. (2020). Multifunctional Urban Spaces a Solution to Increase the Quality of Urban Life in Dense Cities., 12, 34-45. https://doi.org/10.22034/MANZAR.2020.214183.2023.
  14. Hansen, R., Olafsson, A., Jagt, A., Rall, E., & Pauleit, S. (2017). Planning multifunctional green infrastructure for compact cities: What is the state of practice?.Ecological Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2017.09.042.
  15. Itma, M., & Monna, S. (2022). The Role of Collective Spaces in Achieving Social Sustainability: A Comparative Approach to Enhance Urban Design.Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148756.
  16. Ivina, M., & Rakhimova, P. (2023). PUBLIC SPACES IN THE STRUCTURE OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL YOUTH SPACES.Bulletin of Belgorod State Technological University named after. V. G. Shukhov. https://doi.org/10.34031/2071-7318-2023-8-4-67-76.
  17. Kanbarova, G. (2021). FEATURES (XIII-XIV CENTURIES) ILKHANATE PERIOD ARCHITECTURE STYLE., 1031-1048. https://doi.org/10.51582/INTERCONF.19-20.02.2021.105.
  18. Kuo, M. 2015. How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathway. Frontiers in Psychology. 6: 1093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01093
  19. Lotfata, A., Panahandehkhah, M., & Lotfata, Y. (2018). Historical Development and Transformation of Vali-Asr Street, Tehran.Journal of Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.5539/JSD.V11N5P249.
  20. Mehan, A. (2017). MANIFESTATION OF MODERNITY IN IRANIAN PUBLIC SQUARES: BAHARESTAN SQUARE (1826–1978)., 1, 411-420.https://doi.org/10.2495/HA-V1-N3-411-420.
  21. Morozova, A., & Daroudi, A. (2022). Written and Pictorial Sources on the Architecture of Persia and Central Asia during the Era of Timur’s and Timurids’ Rule.Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2022.409.
  22. Munteanu, A., & Andronovici, D. (2022). Aesthetics of the architectural form of community centers - the appearance of multifunctional interior spaces.International Science Journal of Engineering & Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.46299/j.isjea.20220105.02.
  23. Naeeni, D., & Yasoori, K. (2016). Studying the Effect of Continent on Three Important Mosque of Timurid Period (Blue Mosque of Tabriz, Goharshadjame Mosque, Jame Mosque of Yazd).Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 10, 205. https://doi.org/10.5539/MAS.V10N2P205.
  24. Naiemi, A. (2022). The Ilkhanid City of Sultaniyya: Some Remarks on the Citadel and the Outer City.Iran, 60, 91 - 120. https://doi.org/10.1080/05786967.2020.1744469.
  25. Naraghi, A. (2022). A Social History of Modern Tehran.. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009188906.
  26. Paskaleva, E. (2023). Samarqand’s Congregational Mosque of Bibi Khanum as a Representation of Timurid Legitimacy and Rulership.Manazir Journal. https://doi.org/10.36950/manazir.2023.5.4.
  27. Petryshyn, H., Kryvorychko, O., Lukashchuk, H., Danylko, N., & Klishch, O. (2022). Changing the Qualities of Urban Space by Means of Landscape Architecture.Architectural Studies. https://doi.org/10.56318/as2022.01.022.
  28. Pranab, P., & Bansal, V. (2022). Investigating the Idea of Multifunctional Public Spaces for Sustainable Communities.ECS Transactions. https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.18923ecst.
  29. Razavi, N. (2019). Paradise Extended; Re-examining the Cultural Anchors of Historic Pleasure Avenues.The Urban Book Series. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22762-3_3.
  30. Rezaei, M., Marzi, R., & Shojaee, E. (2022). Embedded heritage: the role of information and communication technology (ICT) in urban placemaking (case study: Tehran's citadel).Journal of Historical Archaeology & Anthropological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.15406/jhaas.2022.07.00265.
  31. Rostami, R., Lamit, H., Khoshnava, S., & Rostami, R. (2016). Successful public places: A case study of historical Persian gardens.Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 15, 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG.2015.08.011.
  32. Salsman, T. (2019). Constructing Safavid Iran: Space, Pastoralism, Power, and Identity in Safavid Iran 930-1077/1524-1666.The Undergraduate Historical Journal at UC Merced. https://doi.org/10.5070/h361046135.
  33. Shafiee, A., Faizi, B., & Yazdanfar, C. (2016). THE STUDY OF THE EVOLUTION OF SQUARES IN 3 PERIODS OF SAFAVID, QAJAR AND PAHLAVI WITH HISTORICAL – EVOLUTIONARY AND FORM APPROACH (ISFAHAN AND TEHRAN STYLES).Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 8, 138-162. https://doi.org/10.4314/JFAS.V8I2S.10.
  34. Shi, W., & Woolley, H. (2014). Managing for Multifunctionality in Urban Open Spaces: Approaches for Sustainable Development.Journal of Urban Management, 3, 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2226-5856(18)30081-5.
  35. Sohrabi, N. (2018). MEMORIALIZATION OF WAR BETWEEN CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BEFORE AND AFTER THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTION: PUBLIC ART AND PUBLIC SPACE IN IRAN.ARTis ON. https://doi.org/10.37935/AION.V0I7.202.
  36. Tilaki, M., Marzbali, M., Safizadeh, M., & Abdullah, A. (2021). Quality of place and resident satisfaction in a historic – religious urban settlement in Iran.Journal of Place Management and Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-07-2020-0067.
  37. Vakili, S. (2020). A Comparative Study of Urban Spaces Between Samarkand City in the Timurid Period and Isfahan City in the Safavid Period.Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.larp.20200503.11.
  38. Vejdani, F. (2019). Urban Violence and Space: Lutis, Seminarians, and Sayyids in Late Qajar Iran.Journal of Social History, 52, 1185 - 1211. https://doi.org/10.1093/JSH/SHY010.
  39. Yadollahi, S., & Weidner, S. (2014). Iranian Historical Bazaar as Public Space, case study: Tabriz bazaar.NeuroRehabilitation, 99. https://doi.org/10.14575/GL/REHAB2014/088.
  40. Yekta, Z. (2015). Architecture of Iran in Qajar Era.The International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v5-i5/1638.
  41. Lak, A., & Hakimian, P. (2019). Collective memory and urban regeneration in urban spaces: Reproducing memories in Baharestan Square, city of Tehran, Iran.City, Culture and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CCS.2019.100290.
  42. Blake, S. (2016). Half the world: The social architecture of Safavid Isfahan, 1590–1722. Edinburgh University Press.
  43. Bryce, J., Stewart, C. M., & Stokes, M. (Eds.). (2013). The city as a cultural landscape: Socio-material formations in historical perspective. Routledge.
  44. Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2010). Public places-urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Architectural Press.
  45. Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island Press.
  46. Ghafouri, A., & Weber, S. (2020). Multifunctional urban spaces: A solution for increasing the quality of urban life in dense cities. Manzar, 12(53), 6-15.
  47. Michell, G. (1978). Architecture of the Islamic world: Its history and social meaning. Thames and Hudson.
  48. Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. Paragon House.
  49. OECD. (2001). Multifunctionality: Towards an analytical framework. OECD Publications.
  50. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research(pp. 105–117). Sage Publications, Inc.