ارتقای محتوای دروس معماری بر اساس مکان‌سازی مبتنی بر ظرفیت‌های فضایی: نمونۀ پژوهشی، طرح درس «معماری بومی»

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد، معماری اسلامی، گروه هنر و معماری اسلامی، دانشکده هنر و معماری اسلامی، دانشگاه بین المللی امام رضا ع، مشهد، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با تمرکز بر مسئلۀ هماهنگی میان سرفصل‌های آموزشی درس معماری بومی و ظرفیت‌های نظری معماری بومی، به‌دنبال ارائۀ چهارچوبی نظری و کاربردی برای بهبود آموزش معماری است. در این راستا، مسئلۀ پژوهش در قالب نبود مدلی جامع برای آموزش مفاهیم چندلایه بین ابنیه و طبیعت بررسی شده است. بر این اساس، هدف اصلی پژوهش، توسعۀ محتوای آموزشی درس معماری بومی با استفاده از انگاره‌های مفهومی موضوع پژوهش است. در این مسیر، پژوهش به شناسایی و معادل‌سازی تم‌های اصلی در ظرفیت‌های نظری فضا، مکان، بوم و محیط پرداخته است. ضرورت پرداختن به این مسئله ناشی از چالش‌های طراحی معماری، بدون توجه به شناخت ساختاریافته از محیط و اثرات منفی آن بر کیفیت فضاهای زیستی و تعاملات انسانی است. روش پژوهش، کیفی، از نوع تحلیل تماتیک انتخاب شده و داده‌های پژوهش از 60 کتاب و 50 مقاله مرتبط استخراج شده است. این داده‌ها طی فرآیند کدگذاری و تحلیل، به 16 ترکیب مفهومی مرتبط با تم‌های محیطی و نظری سازماندهی شدند که به‌طور مستقیم در طراحی طرح درس جدید با 16 جلسۀ آموزشی به ‌کار رفته‌اند. نتایج پژوهش از طریق طراحی شبکه‌ای مفهومی و تدوین اهداف رفتاری بر اساس تم‌های محیطی و نظری، الگویی جامع را برای آموزشِ شناخت و مداخلة هدفمند در محیط‌های بومی ارائه کرده است. پژوهش نتیجه‌گیری می‌کند که با استفاده از اصول بوم‌شناسی، ترکیب معماری سنتی و فرهنگ بومی می‌توان آموزش معماری را به‌سمت معماری مبتنی بر ذات بومی آن، یعنی طراحی فضاهای پایدار و مکان‌های زمینه‌گرا، سوق داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Enhancing Architectural Curriculum Content Through Place-Making Based on Spatial Capacities: A Case Study of the "Vernacular Architecture" Course

نویسندگان English

Hadi Farhangdoust 1
Toktam Hanaee 2
1 Master of Islamic Architecture, Faculty of Islamic Art and Architecture, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch, Mashhad, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Introduction
The present research addresses the pivotal challenge of aligning architectural education with the inherent spatial capacities of indigenous environments. The core issue identified in this study is the lack of comprehensive frameworks within architectural curricula that integrate indigenous spatial knowledge with contemporary design mechanisms. Traditional architectural education often overlooks the nuanced interactions between local spatial capacities and human-environment relationships. This oversight results in architects who are less equipped to incorporate indigenous patterns into modern interventions, consequently diminishing the contextual integrity of architectural outputs. The research highlights the necessity to redefine the indigenous architecture course content by recognizing the environmental, cultural, and socio-spatial characteristics of various locales.
The primary objective of this study is to develop an educational framework that bridges the gap between indigenous spatial patterns and contemporary architectural practices. By doing so, the study aims to offer a pragmatic approach to reproducing indigenous architectural concepts within the context of modern design challenges. Through this endeavor, the research seeks to enhance students' capacity to perceive, analyze, and apply local spatial capacities in architectural solutions that are both sustainable and contextually responsive.
The necessity of this research stems from the increasing demand for sustainable and contextually grounded architectural practices. Environmental degradation, loss of cultural identity, and the homogenization of urban spaces have underscored the importance of place-based approaches in architectural education. Addressing these challenges requires a curriculum that fosters a deeper understanding of spatial capacities unique to each locale. The research asserts that embedding such knowledge within architectural education can significantly improve the quality of designed environments and promote cultural resilience in built forms.
Methodology
Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative thematic analysis approach. This method is chosen due to its capability to identify and interpret patterns within qualitative data, particularly in complex and multi-dimensional subjects like architecture. The research process involves a systematic review of 60 books and 50 scholarly articles, selected from an initial pool of over 200 studies. The stages of research include data collection, coding, theme identification, and the development of a theoretical framework that connects indigenous spatial knowledge with contemporary architectural design.
The research progresses through several structured stages. The initial phase involves defining the research problem by identifying gaps in the current indigenous architecture curriculum. This is followed by sample selection from relevant literature to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the subject. Data collection is performed through a meticulous examination of textual sources, with an emphasis on identifying themes related to indigenous spatial patterns and their contemporary applications.
The next stage involves converting data into textual formats for coding and analysis. Familiarization with the collected data allows for the initial identification of key themes and concepts. The coding process is conducted based on theoretical principles, focusing on core elements relevant to the research's hypothesis. Descriptive coding further refines the data by categorizing it based on specific attributes linked to the themes of indigenous architecture.
Subsequently, the study searches for themes that encapsulate broader patterns observed in the data. These themes are reviewed and refined to ensure their relevance and coherence with the research objectives. Key thematic areas identified include spatial capacities, indigenous environmental interactions, and the cultural implications of architectural practices. The refinement process leads to the naming and defining of core themes that align with the educational goals of the indigenous architecture course.
Result and discussion
Achieving theoretical saturation is crucial to ensuring that all relevant dimensions of the research problem are comprehensively covered. The study revisits earlier phases to validate the robustness of the identified themes and their interconnections. Data analysis involves creating a thematic network that visually represents the relationships between themes and sub-themes. This network facilitates a holistic understanding of indigenous spatial knowledge and its pedagogical integration.
Further analysis involves synthesizing the thematic findings into a cohesive curriculum framework for the indigenous architecture course. This framework comprises 16 thematic combinations that align behavioral objectives with identified spatial capacities. The curriculum design includes detailed lesson plans, covering time allocations, lesson topics, key content, teaching methods, and contextual materials for each of the 16 sessions.
The study's key findings reveal that indigenous spatial patterns hold significant potential for enhancing architectural education. Themes such as environmental sustainability, cultural identity, and spatial adaptability emerge as central concepts that can enrich the indigenous architecture curriculum. The research demonstrates that incorporating indigenous knowledge into architectural education can foster more sustainable and culturally resonant design practices.
Conclusion
The final conclusion emphasizes the importance of integrating indigenous spatial knowledge into architectural curricula to address contemporary design challenges. The proposed curriculum framework can serve as a model for other architectural courses, promoting a holistic and context-sensitive approach to architectural education. By acknowledging and utilizing indigenous spatial capacities, the study advocates for a paradigm shift in architectural pedagogy, aligning theoretical knowledge with practical design applications.
The practical implications of this research extend beyond academic settings. By fostering a deeper understanding of local spatial capacities, future architects can create designs that are more attuned to environmental and cultural contexts. This approach not only enhances the sustainability of built environments but also strengthens the cultural continuity of architectural practices. The study underscores the need for continuous adaptation and evolution of architectural curricula to reflect the dynamic interplay between place, culture, and design.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Ecology
Environmental interventions
Environmental capacities
Spatial capacities
Locative capacities
  1.  

    1. Adeoye, D. O., Agboluaje, B., Akindele, O. A., & Oladimeji , S. B. (2023). From Traditional (Vernacular) to ‎Contemporary (New) Architecture: A Lesson from Southwest Nigeria. In M. R. Thomsen, C. Ratti, & M. ‎Tamke (Eds.), Design for Rethinking Resources (pp. 105–125). Gewerbestrasse, cham, Switzerland: ‎Springer Cham. https://doi.org/‎‎10.1007/978-3-031-36554-6_9
    2. Akrami, G., & Damyar, S. (2017). New approach to vernacular architecture considering its structural relationship ‎with sustainable architecture. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 22(1), 29-40. ‎https://doi.org/‎‎10.22059/jfaup.2017.62263‎ [in persian]
    3. Akrami, G., & Sameh, R. (2016). Reflections on Rural Texture and Architecture. Qazvin: Jihad Daneshgahi Of ‎Qazvin.‎ [in persian]
    4. Allen, L. F. (2017). Rural Architecture (Kindle Edition). New Delhi, India: Prabhat Prakashan.‎
    5. Alpago Novello, A. (2019). A. Alpago Novello. Architettura popplare. Lecce, Italy: Youcanprint.‎
    6. Alzahrani, A. (2022). Understanding the role of architectural identity in forming contemporary architecture in Saudi ‎Arabia. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(12), 11715-11736. https://doi.org/‎‎10.1016/j.aej.2022.05.041‎
    7. Arbabzadeh, M., Etessam, I., & Mofidi shemirani, M. (2020). Re-Reading Iranian Vernacular Architecture from a ‎New Perspective from 1961 until Now. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 17(86), 51-64. ‎https://doi.org/‎‎10.22034/bagh.2019.193734.4209‎ [in persian]
    8. Asquith, L., & Vellinga, M. (Eds.). (2006). Vernacular Architecture in the 21st Century. Oxfordshire: Taylor & ‎Francis.‎
    9. Baper, S. Y., & Ismael, Z. K. (2024). The Impact of Site Contexts in Increasing the Diversity of Architectural ‎Concepts: Using an Interactive Architectural Approach. Buildings, 14(8), 2567. ‎https://doi.org/‎‎10.3390/buildings14082567‎
    10. Briggs, C., Burfurd, I., Duckham, M., Guntarik, O., Kerr, D., McMillan, M., & Saldias, D. S. (2020). Bridging the ‎geospatial gap: Data about space and indigenous knowledge of place. Geography Compass, 14(11), ‎e12542. https://doi.org/‎‎10.1111/gec3.12542‎
    11. Cernea, M. M. (Ed.). (1991). Putting People First: Sociological Variables in Rural Development (Expanded ed.). ‎NewYork-London: A World Bank Publication-Oxford University Press.‎
    12. Clarke, V., & Braun , V. (2014). Thematic Analysis. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. ‎CCXLVIII, 2106 (1947–1952)). NewYork: Springer. https://doi.org/‎‎10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_311‎
    13. Correa, C., Sirajuddin, M., & Rasouli, M. (2022). Architecture and identity : proceedings of the regional seminar in the series Exploring architecture in Islamic cultures. (M. Nikfarjam, & F. Shariatrad, Trans.) Tehran: ‎AndishehEhsan.‎
    14. Cromley, E. C. (2022). Experiencing American Houses: Understanding How Domestic Architecture Works ‎‎(Vernacular Architecture Studies). Knoxville, Tennessee, United States: Univ Tennessee Press.‎
    15. Czafík, M., Puškár, B., & Vráblová , E. (2021). Conceptual - contextual thinking in architectural education. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 23(2), 106-111.‎
    16. Dada, A. D., & Alibaba, H. Z. (2023). Comparison analysis between the components of vernacular and modern ‎architectures for sustainable housing in Niger State. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. ‎‎1210, p. 012011. online: 1st International Conference on Design Innovations and Management for ‎Sustainable Environment (ICDIMSE 2022). https://doi.org/‎‎10.1088/1755-1315/1210/1/012011‎
    17. Damyar, S. (2021). The Identity of Vernacular Architecture Based on Human Perceptive Dimensions. Derby, ‎England: Amazonia Co.‎
    18. Damyar, S., & Nari Ghomi, M. (2012). The Comparative Study of the Space Concept in the Vernacular Architecture ‎and Modern Architecture. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 17(1), 65-72. ‎https://doi.org/‎‎10.22059/jfaup.2012.29698‎ [in persian]
    19. DARWISH, M., KAMEL, S., & ASSEM, A. (2023). Extended reality for enhancing spatial ability in architecture ‎design education. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(6), 102104. https://doi.org/‎‎10.1016/j.asej.2022.102104‎
    20. Dethier, J. (1983). Down to earth: Adobe architecture, an old idea, a new future : based on an exhibition at the Centre Georges Pompidou. NewYork: Facts on File.‎
    21. Dong, X. (2021). Research and Application of the Sustainable Architectural Design Theory. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Architecture: Heritage, Traditions and Innovations (pp. 72-78). AHTI: ‎Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/‎‎10.2991/assehr.k.211125.153‎
    22. Ebrahemian, K., Farahani, B. V., Molla Salehi, V., Toofan, S., & Moradinasab, H. (2020). Iranian Architectural ‎Education Curriculum Revision Based on a Strategic Approach with an Emphasis on the Relationship ‎between Theory and Practice. Journal of Instruction and Evaluation, 13(50), 83 - 112. ‎https://doi.org/‎‎10.30495/jinev.2020.1890720.2104‎ [in persian]
    23. Elsamman, M. (2021). Psychological Language In Architecture And Its Impact On The Design Standards And Criterion Of Educational Buildings. Thesis for: Masters of ArtsAdvisor: Prof. ‎Ahmed Abd Elghany Morsy & Prof. Ahmed Hosney Radwan. https://doi.org/‎‎10.13140/RG.2.2.22641.61284
    24. Enwin, A. D., Ikiriko, T. D., & Visigah, K. (2024). Using Geographic Information Systems as Methodologies in ‎Architecture and Urban Planning Research. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, ‎‎5(8), 4064-4082.‎
    25. Farhangdoust, H., Farkisch, H., & Hanaee, T. (2022). Evolution of Theoretical Foundations of Contemporary ‎Architecture and Urban Planning; Transition From the Discourse of Impressionability to Influence. Interdisciplinary Studies of Iranian Architecture, 1(2), 71-103. https://doi.org/‎‎10.22133/isia.2023.371008.1025‎ [in persian]
    26. Farhangdoust, H., Hanaee, T., & Farkisch, H. (2024). Presentation of "integrated teaching reference model" in ‎architecture and urbanization based on curriculum on macro to micro level of education. Interdisciplinary studies in architecture and urbanism development, 3(1), 183 - 211. https://doi.org/‎‎10.71882/jisaud.2024.977665‎ [in persian]
    27. Fathy, H. (1986). Natural Energy and Vernacular Architecture. Principles and Examples with Reference to Hot Arid Climates. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.‎
    28. Fathy, H. (2000). Architecture for the Poor: An Experiment in Rural Egypt. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.‎
    29. Fengji, Z., leilei, S., kaiyi, Z., & liping, J. (2019). Why Factory1: The Spatial Significance of Architectural Education ‎Buildings. KnE Social Sciences, 3(27), 328–338. https://doi.org/‎‎10.18502/kss.v3i27.5537‎
    30. Fleuridor BSc.(Hons), H.-T. (2018). The Responses of Vernacular architecture to Social, Economical and Environmental Conditions: A Dissertation (Kindle Edition ed.).‎
    31. Gaiani, M., Apollonio, F. I., & Ballabeni, A. (2020). Cultural and architectural heritage conservation and ‎restoration: which colour?, Coloration Technology, 137(1), 44-55. https://doi.org/‎‎10.1111/cote.12499‎
    32. Ghasemi, H. (Ed.). (2024). A comprehensive guide to research (20 ed.). Tehran: Andisheh Ara.‎ [in persian]
    33. Giedion, S. (2009). Space, Time and Architecture: The Growth of a New Tradition, Fifth Revised and Enlarged ‎Edition (5th edition ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.‎
    34. Goldhagen, S. W. (2020). Welcome to Your World: How the Built Environment Shapes Our Lives (Reprint edition ‎ed.). NewYork: Harper Paperbacks.‎
    35. Gross , S., & Daley, S. (2021). Backroads Buildings: In Search of the Vernacular. Atglen, Pennsylvania: Schiffer.‎
    36. Guest, G. S., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied Thematic Analysis. London: Sage.‎
    37. Guillery , P. (Ed.). (2010). Built from Below: British Architecture and the Vernacular. London: Routledge.‎
    38. Haji Ibrahim Zargar, A. (2010). An introduction to understanding Iranian rural architecture (5 ed.). Tehran: Shahid ‎Beheshti University Publications.‎ [in persian]
    39. Hall , E. T. (1991). The Hidden Dimension. Oxfordshire: Anchor.‎
    40. Hărmănescu, M., & Enache, C. (2016). Vernacular and Technology. InBetween. Procedia Environmental Sciences, ‎‎32, 412-419. https://doi.org/‎‎10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.047‎
    41. Heath, K. (2016). Vernacular Architecture and Regional Design (Hardcover ed.). London: Routledge.‎
    42. Hefner, B. E. (2017). The Word on the Streets: The American Language of Vernacular Modernism. Virginia : ‎University of Virginia Press.‎
    43. JOHN , M. (2010). Handmade Houses and Other Buildings /anglais. London: THAMES HUDSON.‎
    44. Johnson, M. H. (2010). English Houses 1300-1800: Vernacular Architecture, Social Life. London: Routledge.‎
    45. Kahn, L., & Easton, B. (2000). Shelter: 40th Anniversary Edition. Bolinas, California: Shelter Publications.‎
    46. Kalami, M., & Falahat , M. (2024). Strategies for Making Qualitative the System of Education of Architecture in ‎Iran. Architectural and Environmental Research, 1(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/‎‎10.30470/jaer.2018.32727‎ [in persian]
    47. Kalpana, K. (2003). Madras the Architectural Heritage. New Delhi: INTACH (Indian National Trust for Art and ‎Cultural Heritage).‎
    48. Khaznadar, B. M., & Baper, S. Y. (2023). Sustainable Continuity of Cultural Heritage: An Approach for Studying ‎Architectural Identity Using Typo-Morphology Analysis and Perception Survey. Sustainability, 15(11), ‎‎9050. https://doi.org/‎‎10.3390/su15119050‎
    49. Kim, J. (2023). Interdisciplinary Design Thinking in Architecture Education. London: Routledge. ‎https://doi.org/‎‎10.4324/9781003296355
    50. Kostof , S. (1995). A History of Architecture: Settings and Rituals (Revised edition ed.). (G. Castillo, Ed.) Oxford : ‎Oxford University Press.‎
    51. Lalbakhsh, E., Ghobadian, V., & Azizi, S. (2019). A Model of Architectural Design Education Based on ‎Collaborative and Interactive Thoughts. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 13(3), 649-659. ‎https://doi.org/‎‎10.22061/jte.2018.3519.1886‎ [in persian]
    52. Lefaivre, L., & Tzonis, A. (2003). Critical Regionalism: Architecture and Identity in a Globalized World ‎‎(Architecture in Focus). New York: Prestel Pub.‎
    53. Lejeune, J.-F., & Sabatino, M. (Eds.). (2009). Modern Architecture and the Mediterranean: Vernacular Dialogues and Contested Identities. London: Routledge.‎
    54. Luca, F. D., Natanian, J., & Wortmann, T. (2024). Ten questions concerning environmental architectural design ‎exploration. Building and Environment, 261(1), 111697. https://doi.org/‎‎10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111697‎
    55. Mackay-Lyons, B. (2014). Local Architecture: Building Place, Craft, and Community. NewYork: Princeton ‎Architectural Press.‎
    56. Mahdinezhad, J., Sharghi, A., & Asadpour, F. (2020). Perception of village architecture. Qazvin: Qazvin Jihad ‎Daneshgahi.‎ [in persian]
    57. Mattor, T., & Teegarden, L. (2009). Designing the Maine Landscape ( Illustrated edition ed.). NewYork: Down East ‎Books.‎
    58. Memmott , P., Ting, J., O’Rourke , T., & Vellinga, M. (Eds.). (2023). Design and the Vernacular. London, New York, ‎Sydney and Delhi: Bloomsbury Publishing.‎
    59. Mileto , C., Vegas, F., Soriano, L. G., & Cristini, V. (Eds.). (2014). Vernacular Architecture: Towards a Sustainable Future (Kindle Edition ed.). Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.‎
    60. Mirzaali, M., & Farivar, F. (2017). Rural and nomadic dwellings of Iran. Tehran: Jihad Daneshgahi of Tehran.‎ [in persian]
    61. Mitchell, W. J. (1996). City of Bits: Space, Place, and the Infobahn (On Architecture) (Revised ed. ed.). Cambridge, ‎Massachusetts: The MIT Press.‎
    62. Moosavi, S., Saghafi, M., Mozaffar, F., & Izadi, S. (2018). Using Vernacular Architecture in Design of Practices for ‎Architectural Design Basics. Scientific Journal of Maremat & Me'mari-e Iran, 7(14), 61-74. https://doi.org/‎‎ ‎‎20.1001.1.23453850.1396.7.14.2.8‎ [in persian]
    63. Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop ‎a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. ‎https://doi.org/‎‎10.1177/16094069231205789‎
    64. Noble, A. (2013). Vernacular Buildings: A Global Survey (International Library of Human Geography Book 20). ‎London: I.B. Tauris.‎
    65. Nowell , L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the ‎Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). ‎https://doi.org/‎‎10.1177/1609406917733847‎
    66. Oliver, P. (1998). Encyclopedia of Vernacular Architecture of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.‎
    67. Oliver, P. (2007). Built to Meet Needs: Cultural Issues in Vernacular Architecture (Kindle Edition ed.). London: ‎Routledge.‎
    68. Oruikor, G. J., Ewane, H. D., Durotoye, M. P., & Celsus , A. (2023). THE IMPACT OF CLASSROOM DESIGN ON ‎STUDENT LEARNING: A CASE STUDY OF CAMERON SCHOOLS. Journal of Global Issues and Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(1), 21-40.‎
    69. Ouroussoff, N. (2022). Reading Architecture in an Era of Globalization. (Flagship Press) Retrieved 1 10, 2024, ‎from HARVARD DESIGN MAGAZINE: https://www.harvarddesignmagazine.org/articles/reading-‎architecture-in-an-era-of-globalization
    70. Rapoport, A. (2020). Pour une anthropologie de la maison (3 ed.). (K. Afzalian, Trans.) Mashhad: Kasra Publishing.‎
    71. Rezvani, M., Salmani, M., Ghanbari Nasab, A., & Baghiani, H. (2010). Ecological Foot Prints, A New Approach for ‎Measuring the Environmental Impacts (Concept, Application and its Measurement). Geography and Development, 8(20), 145-166. https://doi.org/‎‎10.22111/gdij.2010.635‎ [in persian]
    72. Richard, B. (2024). Vernacular Architecture: Modern Adaptations and Innovations (Kindle Edition ed.).‎
    73. Rudofsky, B. (1987). Architecture Without Architects: A Short Introduction to Non-Pedigreed Architecture ‎‎(Reprint edition ed.). New Mexico: University of New Mexico Press.‎
    74. Sadat, S. A., Zarghami, I., & Khaki, A. (2016). A comparative study of sustainable architecture and compliance with ‎the vernacular architecture of traditional houses in Iranian-Islamic. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design, 3(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/‎‎20.1001.1.25886274.1394.3.1.2.2‎ [in persian]
    75. Saifudeen, A., & Mani, M. (2024). Adaptation of buildings to climate change: an overview. Frontiers in Built Environment, 10, 1327747. https://doi.org/‎‎10.3389/fbuil.2024.1327747
    76. Salama, A. M. (2015). Spatial Design Education. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/‎‎10.4324/9781315610276‎
    77. Sartipipour, M. (2009). Pathology of rural architecture towards desirable settlement. Tehran: Shahidi.‎ [in persian]
    78. Sartipipour, M. (2010). Rural Houses in Iran. Tehran: Islamic Revolution Housing Foundation.‎
    79. Sayigh, A. (Ed.). (2019). Sustainable Vernacular Architecture: How the Past Can Enrich the Future (Kindle ‎Edition ed.). Berlin: Springer.‎
    80. Sediadi, E., & Semlali, A. (2022). The Role of Digital Architecture in Students’ Design Best Practices. International Webinar on Digital Architecture 2021 (pp. 114-118). IWEDA: Atlantis Press. ‎https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220703.020‎
    81. Strand, I., & Nielsen , L. M. (2024). Architecture in school practice: possible tools for supporting spatial literacy. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/‎‎10.1007/s10798-024-09951-0
    82. Tambolaš, A. Č., Vujičić, L., & Jančec, L. (2023). Relationship between structural and social dimensions of school ‎culture. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1057706. https://doi.org/‎‎10.3389/feduc.2022.1057706
    83. Tipnis, A. (2015). Vernacular Traditions: contemporary architecture (Kindle Edition ed.). New Delhi, India: The ‎Energy and Resources Institute.‎
    84. Trillo, C., Barba, S., Cotella, V. A., & Ncube, C. (2021). Digital Innovations For Architectural Traditional Heritage Conservation. Cities in a Changing World: Questions of Culture, Climate ‎and Design Online, 24.1, pp. 252-265. New York.‎
    85. Turan, M. (Ed.). (2024). Vernacular Architecture: Paradigms of Environmental Response (Kindle Edition ed.). ‎London: Routledge.‎
    86. Turner, J. F. (1976). Housing by People: Towards Autonomy in Building Environments. London: Marion Boyars .‎
    87. Umana, A. U., Garba, B. M., Ologun, A., Olu , J. S., & Umar, M. O. (2024). The impact of indigenous architectural ‎practices on modern urban housing in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 23(03), 422–433. https://doi.org/‎‎10.30574/wjarr.2024.23.3.2703‎
    88. Vellinga, M., Oliver, P., & Bridge, A. (2024). Atlas of Vernacular Architecture of the World (Kindle Edition ed.). ‎London: Routledge.‎
    89. Vercellotti, M. (2017). Do interactive learning spaces increase student achievement? A comparison of classroom ‎context. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 197-210. https://doi.org/‎‎10.1177/1469787417735606‎
    90. Weber, W., & Yannas, S. (Eds.). (2013). Lessons from Vernacular Architecture. London: Routledge.‎
    91. Zeinali, F., & Farahza, N. (2020). Integrated Design Taught With Technical Knowledge In ‎Architectural Education Comparison Architectural Curriculum in Undergraduate in the Top ‎World Universities & Iran. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 25(2), 95-106. ‎https://doi.org/‎‎10.22059/jfaup.2021.267314.672136‎ [in persian]
    92. Zhang, L., & Shen , T. (2024). Integrating Sustainability into Contemporary Art and Design: An Interdisciplinary ‎Approach. Sustainability, 16(15), 6539. https://doi.org/‎‎10.3390/su16156539
    93. Zomarshidi, H., & Gholami Moghaddam, E. (2024). The magnificent arts of architecture. Tehran: zomorod.‎ [in persian]