بهینه‌سازی فرم شهری پایدار با استفاده از الگوریتم‌های چندمعیاره (مورد مطالعه: شهر بهارستان)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه شهرسازی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران.

2 استادیار و عضو هیات علمی، گروه معماری و شهرسازی، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه اشرفی اصفهانی، اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده
رشد شهرنشینی و محدودیت در زمین و منابع زیست‌محیطی، ضرورت توسعۀ پایدار در کلان‌شهرها را نمایان می‌کند. شکل پایدار شهر یکی از راه‌های دست ‌یافتن به این ضرورت است. در همین راستا، این مقاله به ارائۀ الگوریتمی جهت ساماندهی شکل شهر و تحلیل دریافت نور خورشید در طرح ایجادشده و با هدف حداکثر کردن میزان زیربنا و مساحت حیاط برای بلوک‌های مسکونی تولیدشده توسط همین الگوریتم به مدل‌سازی یک منطقۀ شهری در شهر بهارستان اصفهان می‌پردازد. روش این پژوهش از نظر هدف، کاربردی‑توسعه‌ای و از نظر روش ترکیبی از روش‌های اسنادی، تحلیلی و مدل‌سازی است که با 5000 مدل‌سازی با الگوریتم چندمعیار والاسی ایجاد می‌شود و نتایج شبیه‌سازی‌های طرح به‌دست‌آمده نشان می‌دهد که این روش توانایی بالایی در ایجاد فضای‌های شهری با بهره‌مندی بسیار بالا از شاخص‌های انرژی تابشی خورشید، با دسترسی 95 درصد مناطق از انرژی بیش از 1000 کیلو وات‌ساعت ‌بر‌ مترمربع، میزان دسترسی به گنبد آسمان در فضای باز شهری و فضاهای داخلی ساختمان‌ها بیش از 70 درصد و میزان ساعت برخورداری از نور خورشید بیش از 35 ساعت در کوتاه‌ترین ماه سال را دارد و دارای پتانسیل بالایی در تسهیل طراحی برای کارشناسان حوزۀ شهری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Optimization of Sustainable Urban Form Using Multi-criteria Algorithms (Case study: Baharestan city)

نویسندگان English

Ahmad Najafi 1
Ramtin Mortaheb 2
Keyvan Rafiei 1
Bahareh Tadayon 1
1 Department of Urban Planning, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Faculty Member, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Ashrafi Esfahani University, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Rapid urbanization necessitates sustainable urban development, particularly optimizing urban form due to land and environmental resource limitations. Modern urban growth often overlooks traditional solar access, resulting in energy imbalances and urban heat islands, as exemplified by the poor air quality in Baharestan and Isfahan in 2019. There's an urgent need for solutions to increase building density while ensuring direct sunlight, thermal comfort, and reduced energy consumption. Algorithmic processes, especially parametric design, offer a novel approach to optimizing urban morphology for multiple, often conflicting objectives, such as maximizing building footprint and courtyard area while ensuring solar access. This study addresses this gap by presenting an integrated model for urban form organization in Baharestan City using multi-criteria algorithms and a solar envelope approach. The main objective is to propose an urban form organization algorithm for Baharestan, analyzing solar light reception and resulting energy in outdoor spaces. Sub-objectives include creating vertical green space patterns, proposing optimal urban block design rules, and developing a climate-optimized multi-variable algorithm for urban development. Ultimately, this research aims to foster a more sustainable city by maximizing building volume using the solar envelope method.
Theoretical Framework
The study integrates "compact city" principles – optimizing land use, increasing density, and promoting mixed-use development – with the "low-carbon energy city" theory, which focuses on reducing greenhouse gas emissions through energy optimization and the use of renewable sources. Solar access is fundamental to both, enabling natural illumination and reducing heating and cooling demands. Multi-criteria algorithms are crucial here, as they balance conflicting sustainability objectives (e.g., maximizing area versus solar access). The solar envelope defines maximum building heights while preserving solar access. Evolutionary computations provide tools for exploring sustainable urban forms. Recent urban planning research has increasingly leveraged Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) algorithms, combined with advanced computational techniques such as machine learning and genetic algorithms, to achieve optimal urban design.
Methodology
This research is applied-developmental, providing a practical and generalizable algorithmic modeling approach for urban design that combines documentary, analytical, and modeling methods. Multi-criteria algorithms like Wallacei are chosen because urban design problems often involve conflicting objectives (e.g., maximizing footprint vs. solar access). These algorithms provide Pareto optimal solutions for complex decision-making.
In the modeling phase, 5000 simulations using the Wallacei multi-criteria algorithm selected the optimal urban layout for residential blocks, maximizing building footprint and courtyard area. Subsequent analyses included solar radiation energy, sky dome coverage, and solar access hours in outdoor urban spaces. Baharestan City, Isfahan (51E, 32N), was the case study, with Meteonorm climate data validated using data from the Isfahan Shahid Beheshti Airport station.
The parametric solar envelope calculation defines direct solar access conditions. Steps involved: 2D site modeling in Rhinoceros; importing EPW weather data into Ladybug plugin to set solar radiation and minimum temperature (20°C, 475 W/m² on December 21st); determining shading boundaries (1.5-2m above ground); setting modeling time (8:00 AM-4:00 PM on December 21st); and generating a 30m maximum height geometric polygon for the solar envelope. The 35-hectare Baharestan study area was divided into five blocks. Rhinoceros 6 SR30, Grasshopper v1, and DecodingSpaces 2020 were used for parametric modeling. After the initial division (Figure 1), 5,000 multi-criteria parametric models were run via Wallacei (Figures 2 and 3). Eight optimal options per area were selected, maximizing building potential and courtyard area (Figure 4). Solar envelope structures were determined for each building on December 21st (the lowest sun angle), considering shadow lines (1.5-2m) and the maximum buildable height (30m), which defined the permissible volumes. Final building volumes were obtained by placing solar envelope volumes in 3-meter voxels to ensure winter sunlight access (Figure 5).
Results and Discussion
Climate data indicated Baharestan's outdoor environment requires direct sun for comfort for six months and shade for four months (Figure 6). Buildable space categorization showed high density (Table 1). Over 95% of open spaces in all five blocks received more than 1000 kWh/m² of solar energy annually, suggesting potential for energy self-sufficiency (Figure 7). Sky dome access averaged over 70% in outdoor spaces and floor plans, aiding natural light utilization (Figure 8). Solar access hours in December (the shortest day) consistently showed over 35 hours of direct sunlight across most urban areas (Figure 9).
Conclusion
This research successfully developed a comprehensive framework for optimizing sustainable urban form in Baharestan using parametric design and multi-criteria algorithms. The Wallacei genetic algorithm facilitated the evaluation of 5,000 models, yielding optimal layouts. The findings align with previous studies on the impact of urban form on environmental sustainability, particularly in terms of solar access and thermal comfort. The study's innovation lies in its simultaneous optimization of conflicting objectives: maximizing building footprint, courtyard area, and solar access. The integrated, climate-optimized algorithm effectively handles complex urban design challenges in specific climates. Its high efficiency is evidenced by over 1,000 kWh/m² of solar radiant energy in 95% of areas, over 70% sky dome access, and over 35 hours of solar access in the shortest month. These results directly address the issues of energy consumption and air pollution in cities like Isfahan. The method facilitates urban green spaces on building levels and significantly meets daylight needs. This research enriches parametric design and multi-criteria algorithms, offering an efficient tool for urban planners to create more sustainable and resilient cities.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sustainable Urban Form
Parametric Design
Genetic Algorithm
Urban Development
Solar Envelope
Multi-Criteria Optimization
  1. Ahmadpour, N., Pourjafar, M., Mahdavinejad, M., & Yousefian, S. (2017). The Role and Impact of Design Elements on the Quality of Thermal Comfort in Urban Open Spaces Case Study: Design of Pedestrian Way in Tamghachiha Pathway in the City of Kashan. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 9(18), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.30480/aup.2017.512 [in persian]
  2. Adulkongkaew, T., Satapanajaru, T., Charoenhirunyingyos, S., & Singhirunnusorn, W. (2020). Effect of land cover composition and building configuration on land surface temperature in an urban-sprawl city, case study in Bangkok Metropolitan Area, Thailand. Heliyon, 6(8), e04485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04485
  3. Apreda, C., Reder, A., & Mercogliano, P. (2020). Urban morphology parameterization for assessing the effects of housing blocks layouts on air temperature in the Euro-Mediterranean context. Energy and Buildings, 223, 110171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110171
  4. Bazán, J., Rieradevall, J., Gabarrell, X., & Vázquez-Rowe, I. (2017). Low-carbon electricity production through the implementation of photovoltaic panels in rooftops in urban environments: A case study for three cities in Peru. The Science of the Total Environment, 622–623, 1448–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.003
  5. Behzadfar M., Rezvani B. (2015). A Comparative Study of Morphological Norms of Islamic Urbanism in Historical Texture (Case Study: Neighborhood Sarcheshmeh of Gorgan City). JRIA. 3(1), 1-19. http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-177-en.html [in persian]

 

  1. Butti, K., & John, P. (1980). A Golden Thread, 2500 Years of Solar Architecture and Technology. Palo Alto, CA: Cheshire Books.
  2. Chen, H., Han, Q., & De Vries, B. (2019). Urban morphology indicator analyzes for urban energy modeling. Sustainable Cities and Society, 52, 101863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101863
  3. Changalvaiee, Y., Behzadfar, M., Mohhamadi, M. & Saeideh Zarabadid, Z. S. (2018). A practical approach to analysis of the generic flows of sustainable urban form with a focus on Eco-Efficient Urban Form (EEUF) model (The case of Isfahan morphological types). Motaleate Shahri, 7(28), 55-64. doi: 10.34785/J011.2018.016 [in persian]
  4. Davtalab, J., Hafezi, M., R. & Adib, M. (2016). Vegetation and Thermal Comfort in Open Spaces: The Case of Sistan Province. Soffeh, 26(4), 19-42. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100325.html?lang=en [in persian]
  5. Hassan, A.M., ELMokadem, A.A., Megahed, N.A., & Eleinen, O.M.A. (2020). Urban morphology as a passive strategy in promoting outdoor air quality. Journal of Building Engineering, 29, 101204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101204
  6. He, B., Ding, L., & Prasad, D. (2020). Relationships among local-scale urban orphology, urban ventilation, urban heat island and outdoor thermal comfort under sea breeze influence. Sustainable Cities and Society, 60, 102289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102289
  7. Hou, K., & Chen, S. (2023). Linking energy crises and solar energy in China: a roadmap towards environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(57), 119925–119934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30657-8
  8. Islam, M.A., Mamun, A.A., Ali, M.N., Ashique, R.H., Hasan, A., Hoque, M.M., Maruf, M.H., Mansur, M.A.A., & Shihavuddin, A. (2024). Integrating PV-based energy production utilizing the existing infrastructure of MRT-6 at Dhaka, Heliyon, 10(2), e24078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24078
  9. Jamali, Siroos.(2012), A Study on the Impact of Housing Typology on Urban Morphology , Case Study: Tabriz Metropolis, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tabriz.
  10. Jamali, S. (2015). Evaluating the Place of Typomorphological Approaches in Urban Development Plans in Iran , Case of Tabriz Metropolis. Journal of Arid Regions Geographic Studies, 6(19), 85-102.
  11. Karamirad, S., aliabadi, M., & Habibi, A. (2018). Assessing the Impact of Urban Geometry on Outdoor Thermal Comfort in Microclimate Scale: A Case Study of the Open Space of Goldasht Residential Complex in Shiraz. Regional Planning, 8(29), 161-172.
  12. Karimi, S., Eghbali, S.R. (2017). Troubleshooting form-rise buildings using parametric design process and compare the output optimized form in terms of radiation exposure, Intenational Journal of Urban and Rural Management.15(45), 225-238. http://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-1426-fa.html [in persian]
  13. Kettles, C.M.C. (2008). A Comprehensive Review of Solar Access Law in the United States (Report). Solar America Board for Codes and Standards.
  14. Knowles, R. (1974). Energy and form: an ecological approach to urban growth. Cambridge, Massachusetts., United States: MIT Press.
  15. Knowles, R.L., Berry, R.D. (1980). "Solar envelope concepts: Moderate density building applications. Final report". doi:10.2172/6736314.
  16. Leng, H., Chen, X., Ma, Y., Wong, N. H., & Ming, T. (2020). Urban morphology and building heating energy consumption: Evidence from Harbin, a severe cold region city. Energy and Buildings, 224, 110143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110143
  17. Mahmoudi M, N.S. (2011). Improving of Climatic Technology According to Sustainable Development. Naqshejahan, 1 (1), 35-52. http://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-8373-fa.html [in Persian]
  18. Mehdizadeh Seraj, F., Mirzaee, F., Fayaz, R., Mofidi Shemirani S.M. (2019). Solar Radiation Absorbed on the Neighborhood Scale regarding the Rural Fabric in Cold Climate Regions. JHRE. 38(167), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.22034/38.167.19 [in Persian]
  19. Morganti, M., Salvati, A., Coch, H., & Cecere, C. (2017). Urban morphology indicators for solar energy analysis. Energy Procedia, 134, 807–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.533
  20. Mosey, G., & Deal, B. (2020b). Multivariate Optimization in Large-Scale Building Problems: An architectural and urban design approach for balancing social, environmental, and economic sustainability. Sustainability, 12(23), 10052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310052
  21. Mosey, G., & Deal, B. (2020). Multivariate Optimization in Large-Scale Building Problems: An Architectural and Urban Design Approach for Balancing Social, Environmental, and Economic Sustainability. Sustainability, 12(23), 10052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310052
  22. Mathern, A., Steinholtz, O.S., Sjöberg, A., Önnheim, M., Ek, K., Rempling, R., Gustavsson, E., & Jirstrand, M. (2020). Multi-objective constrained Bayesian optimization for structural design. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 63(2), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02720-2
  23. Mosey, G., & Deal, B. (2020). Multivariate Optimization in Large-Scale Building Problems: An architectural and urban design approach for balancing social, environmental, and economic sustainability. Sustainability, 12(23), 10052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310052
  24. Murphy, M., Badland, H., Jordan, H., Koohsari, M. J., & Giles-Corti, B. (2018). Local Food Environments, Suburban Development, and BMI: A Mixed Methods study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7), 1392. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071392
  25. Othman, H.A.S., & Alshboul, A.A. (2020). The role of urban morphology on outdoor thermal comfort: The case of Al-Sharq City – Az Zarqa. Urban Climate, 34, 100706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100706
  26. Perera, A., Javanroodi, K., & Nik, V.M. (2021). Climate resilient interconnected infrastructure: Co-optimization of energy systems and urban morphology. Applied Energy, 285, 116430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116430
  27. Parekh, N.R., Smith, N.C., & Brown, N.N. (2024). Deep reinforcement learning for multi-criteria optimization in BIM-supported sustainable building design. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 13(1), 1030–1048. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.1.1775
  28. Prieto-Curiel, R., Patino, J.E., & Anderson, B. (2023). Scaling of the morphology of African cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 120(9), e2214254120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2214254120
  29. Sanagar Darbani, E., Rafiyan, M., Hanaee, T. & Monsefi Parapari, D. (2018). Environmental Effects Of Urban Geometry Changes On Air Temperature And Outdoor Thermal Comfort In Arid Climate Of Mashhad (Case Study Of Pachenar And Shahed). Journal of Environmental Studies, 43(4), 561-578. https://doi.org/10.22059/jes.2018.247624.1007570 [in Persian]
  30. Shoshtari, S., Ghalehnoee, M., Ezzatian, V., Maleki, A., Paknejad, M. & rahpou, R. (2018). Studying the combined method in identifying Urban Heat Islands and their Mitigation via Urban Green Spaces (case study: Isfahan City). Motaleate Shahri, 7(28), 41-54. https://doi.org/34785/J011.2018.015 [in Persian]
  31. Taghvaei, M., Warsi, H., & Narimani, M. (2016). Physical development strategy and sustainable form of Isfahan city with approach of smart growth and compact city . Intenational Journal of Urban and Rural Management. 14 (41), 339-358. http://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-723-fa.html [in Persian]
  32. Tahbaz, M.(2017). Climatic knowledge of architectural design, Tehran, Shahid Beheshti Pub.
  33. Wei, R., Song, D., Wong, N. H., & Martin, M. (2016). Impact of urban morphology parameters on microclimate. Procedia Engineering, 169, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.10.017
  34. Vengosh, A., & Weinthal, E. (2022). The water consumption reductions from home solar installation in the United States. The Science of the Total Environment, 854, 158738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158738
  35. Wicki, S., Schwaab, J., Perhac, J., & Grêt-Regamey, A. (2021). Participatory multi-objective optimization for planning dense and green cities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(14), 2532–2551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1875999
  36. Xu, H., Chen, H., Zhou, X., Wu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2020). Research on the relationship between urban morphology and air temperature based on mobile measurement: A case study in Wuhan, China. Urban Climate, 34, 100671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100671
  37. Xu, X., AzariJafari, H., Gregory, J., Norford, L., & Kirchain, R. (2020). An integrated model for quantifying the impacts of pavement albedo and urban morphology on building energy demand. Energy and Buildings, 211, 109759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109759
  38. Yao, J., Murray, A. T., Wang, J., & Zhang, X. (2019). Evaluation and development of sustainable urban land use plans through spatial optimization. Transactions in GIS, 23(4), 705–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12531
  39. Yu, Z., Chen, S., Wong, N.H., Ignatius, M., Deng, J., He, Y., & Hii, D.J.C. (2020). Dependence between urban morphology and outdoor air temperature: A tropical campus study using random forests algorithm. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61, 102200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102200
  40. Zhang, H., Yu, Z., Zhu, C., Yang, R., Yan, B., & Jiang, G. (2023). Green or not? Environmental challenges from photovoltaic technology. Environmental Pollution, 320, 121066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121066
  41. Zhang, L., Qiao, G., Huang, H., Chen, Y., & Luo, J. (2021). Evaluating Spatiotemporal Distribution of Residential Sprawl and Influencing Factors Based on Multi-Dimensional Measurement and GeoDetector Modelling. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8619. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168619
  42. Zhu, R., Wong, M.S., You, L., Santi, P., Nichol, J., Ho, H.C., Lu, L., & Ratti, C. (2020). The effect of urban morphology on the solar capacity of three-dimensional cities. Renewable Energy, 153, 1111–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.050