خلاقیت کودکانه در فضا؛ مقایسۀ تجربۀ فضای باز و بسته در سن پیش‌دبستانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی‌ارشد گروه معماری، دانشکدۀ معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

2 استاد گروه معماری، دانشکدۀ معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

3 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه معماری، دانشکدۀ معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده
در دنیای امروز که کودکان بیشتر در فضاهای بسته و محیط‌های شهری رشد می‌کنند، طراحی هوشمندانۀ فضاهای بازی و آموزشی که زمینۀ تجربه‌های حسی، کشف و تعامل با محیط را فراهم کنند، نقش کلیدی در شکوفایی خلاقیت و توسعۀ شناختی کودکان دارد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف مقایسۀ نحوۀ تجربۀ فضا و تعامل کودک با محیط در دو حالت طبیعی/باز و ساخته‌شده/بسته و شناسایی ویژگی‌های فضایی مؤثر در بروز و رشد خلاقیت کودکانه است. این پژوهش از نوع کاربردی و از لحاظ روش اجرا، دارای طرح توصیفی–مقایسه‌ای به‌دنبال شناسایی نقش محیط در بروز خلاقیت کودکان پیش‌دبستانی و فراهم کردن اصول طراحی فضاهای مناسب برای این گروه سنی است. در این مطالعه، پنج مؤلفۀ تفکر خلاق شامل «سیالی»، «ابتکار»، «انعطاف‌پذیری»، «بسط» و «خلاقیت کل» با استفاده از آزمون استاندارد تورنس (TTCT) ارزیابی شده‌اند. جامعۀ آماری این پژوهش را کودکان دورۀ پیش‌دبستانی ساکن منطقۀ ۲ شهرستان مراغه تشکیل می‌دادند. از میان این جامعه، دو گروه نمونه انتخاب شدند که به‌ترتیب در محیط‌های باز و بسته فعالیت داشتند. نمونه‌گیری به‌صورت هدفمند و بر اساس معیارهای مشخص (مانند سن، مقطع تحصیلی و نوع محیط فعالیت) انجام گرفت تا امکان مقایسۀ مؤثر بین دو گروه فراهم شود. یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که تعامل مستقیم با محیط طبیعی نقش به‌سزایی در تقویت و شکوفایی خلاقیت کودکان دارد؛ به‌طوری‌که کودکانی که در فضای باز و طبیعی فعالیت داشتند، نسبت به گروهی که در محیط سنتی مهدکودک فعالیت می‌کردند، افزایش معناداری در مؤلفه‌های تفکر خلاق (سیالی، ابتکار، انعطاف‌پذیری، بسط و خلاقیت کل) نشان دادند. در این پژوهش، تأثیر نوع فضا بر مؤلفه‌های خلاقیت به‌صورت تفکیکی بررسی شد؛ نتایج نشان داد که مؤلفۀ «ابتکار» در فضای باز و مؤلفۀ «انعطاف‌پذیری» در فضای بسته بیشترین رشد را داشته‌اند که بیانگر اثر متفاوت محیط‌ها بر ابعاد گوناگون تفکر خلاق است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Children's creativity in space; Comparison of open and closed space experience in preschool age

نویسندگان English

Mahsa Mashhadifam 1
Azita Belali oskoyi 2
Yahya Jamali 3
1 Master's student, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran.
3 PhD student, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Introduction
In today's world, where children grow up mostly in closed spaces and urban environments, intelligently designing play and educational spaces that provide opportunities for sensory experiences, discovery, and interaction with the environment plays a key role in the flourishing of children's creativity and cognitive development. The present study aims to compare how children experience space and interact with the environment in two modes: natural/open and constructed/closed, and to identify spatial characteristics that are effective in the emergence and development of children's creativity.
Methodology
 This research is of an applied type, and in terms of its implementation method, it has a descriptive-comparative design seeking to identify the role of the environment in the emergence of creativity in preschool children and to provide principles for designing appropriate spaces for this age group. In this study, five components of creative thinking, including "fluidity", "initiative", "flexibility", "expansion", and "total creativity", were assessed using the Torrance Standard Test (TTCT). The statistical population of this study consisted of preschool children living in Region 2 of Maragheh County. From this population, two sample groups were selected, which were active in open and closed environments, respectively. Sampling was carried out purposively and based on specific criteria (such as age, educational level, and type of activity environment) to allow for effective comparison between the two groups.

This research is derived from the master's thesis of architecture titled "Designing a children's ecological garden with the approach of promoting creativity in the city of Maragheh" and was carried out under the guidance of Dr. Azita Bilali Eskoui at Tabriz University of Islamic Arts.

Result and discussion
 The findings of the present study showed that direct interaction with the natural environment plays a significant role in strengthening and developing children's creativity; so that children who were active in an open and natural space showed a substantial increase in the components of creative thinking (fluency, originality, flexibility, expansion, and overall creativity) compared to the group who were active in a traditional kindergarten environment. In this study, the effect of space type on creativity components was examined separately; the results showed that the "innovation" component in open space and the "flexibility" component in closed space had the most significant growth, which indicates the different effects of environments on various dimensions of creative thinking.
Conclusion
The results of this research showed that the type of learning environment has a significant effect on the different components of preschool children's creativity. The findings indicated that the children who worked in the natural open environment (Economic Garden) had a significant improvement in all components of creativity, especially in the "initiative" component. This clearly shows that spaces rich in natural stimuli, freedom of interaction, sensory diversity, and direct experience opportunities provide a suitable platform for the growth of innovation power, generation of innovative ideas, and strengthening of creative thinking in children. On the other hand, the group that worked in the closed environment of the kindergarten, although their overall creativity growth was more limited, showed the most significant increase in the "flexibility" component. This issue can indicate that closed environments, by providing specific frameworks and mental order, can help to develop the ability to change the thought path, adapt to the rules, and practice cognitive displacement. In sum, the findings of this research showed that both types of environment (open or closed) with their unique characteristics can act as an effective stimulus in the development of specific dimensions of creativity. Therefore, the purposeful and balanced combination of open and closed space, according to their different effects on the components of creativity, can be the basis for the all-round growth of creativity in children and provide a favorable platform for the formation of flexible, innovative, and problem-oriented minds in the future generation.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Space
Creativity
Child
Architectural design
  1. Abdi, A. (2016). Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences and its application in the classroom. Conference on Modern Methods of School Management in the Third Millennium, Kermanshah: Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah Branch. [in Persian]
  2. Azadi, N., & Dezhkouhi, M. J. (2021). A comparison of first-grade mathematics textbooks in selected countries based on Gardner’s multiple intelligences. Poyesh in Basic Sciences, 7, 33–47. [in Persian]
  3. Barrett, P., & Barrett, L. (2010). The potential of positive places: Senses, brain, and spaces. Intelligent Buildings International, 2(3), 218–228. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3763/inbi.2010.0042
  4. Barrouillet, P. (2015). Theories of cognitive development: From Piaget to today. Developmental Review, 38, 1–12.
  5. Crain, W. (2019). Theories of development: Concepts and applications .(A. Rajaei & G. Khouynejad, Trans.). Tehran: Roshd. [in Persian]
  6. Dannenberg, A., Frumkin, H., Jackson, R. J., & Tilson, H. H. (2011). Making healthy places: Designing and building for health, well-being, and sustainability. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  7. Dere, Z. (2019). Investigating the creativity of children in early childhood education institutions. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 652–658.
  8. Dul, J., Ceylan, C., & Jaspers, F. (2011). Knowledge workers’ creativity and the role of the physical work environment. Human Resource Management, 50(6), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20454
  9. Dyment, J. E., & Bell, A. C. (2007). Grounds for movement: Green school grounds as sites for promoting physical activity. Health Education Research, 23(6), 952–962.
  10. Edwards, C. P. (2002). Three approaches from Europe: Waldorf, Montessori, and Reggio Emilia. Faculty Publications, Department of Child, Youth, and Family Studies, 2. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/famconfacpub/2
  11. Farshchi, H., & Gholami, Z. (2017). Study and architectural design of a children's home in Kashan based on the development of children's creativity for children 4 to 7 years old. Research in Art and Human Sciences, 3(6), 21–32. [in Persian]
  12. Fathi Rezaie, Z., Abbaspour, K., & Zamani Sani, S. H. (2020). The effect of play in natural outdoor and indoor spaces on the social and perceptual development of preschool children. Motor Behavior, 12(40), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.22089/mbj.2019.7298.1796 [in Persian]
  13. Frede, E., & Ackerman, D. J. (2017). Preschool curriculum decision-making: Dimensions to consider. In Handbook of Coaching Children in Sport (pp. 27–39).
  14. Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind: What all students should understand. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  15. Gordon, M., & Browne, K. W. (2011). Foundations in early childhood education. Cengage Learning.
  16. Gray C, Gibbons R, Larouche R, Sandseter, E, Bienenstock A, Brussoni M, Power M. What is the relationship between outdoor time and physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and physical fitness in children? A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(6):645-74.
  17. Gucyeter, S., & Erdogan, S. C. (2020). Creative children in a robust learning environment: Perceptions of special education teacher candidates. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100687
  18. Hossein, Sh., Heydari, M. H., & Sa’adatmand, Z. M. (2019). A comparative study of Montessori and Loris Malaguzzi’s perspectives on early childhood education. Curriculum Planning Research Quarterly, 16(2), 82–105. [in Persian]
  19. Kadivar, P. (2008). Educational psychology. Tehran: SAMT. [in Persian]
  20. Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3–14.
  21. Kozulin, A. (2013). Vygotsky’s psychology: Explanation of ideas (B. Arab Daftari, Trans.). Tehran: Forouzan Publishing. [in Persian]
  22. Krumm, G., Lemos, V., & Filippetti, V. A. (2014). Factor structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Figural Form B in Spanish-speaking children: Measurement invariance across gender. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 72–81.
  23. Kupers, E., Lehmann-Wermser, A., McPherson, G., & van Geert, P. (2019). Children’s creativity: Theoretical framework and systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 89(1), 93–124.
  24. Lefa, B. (2014). The Piaget theory of cognitive development: An educational implication. Educational Psychology, 1(1), 1–8.
  25. McCoy, J. M. (2005). Linking the physical work environment to creative context. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(3), 167–189. https:// doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01257.x
  26. McLachlan, C., Fleer, M., & Edwards, S. (2018). Early childhood curriculum for students and educators (S. Ghasemtabar & M. Hajitabar Firoozjai, Trans.). Tehran: Roshd Farhang. [in Persian]
  27. Mofidi, F. (2013). Foundations of preschool education (3rd ed.). Tehran: SAMT. [in Persian]
  28. Mofidi, M. R. (2017). Research method in architecture: Proposal, thesis, article writing. Tehran: Simaye Danesh. [in Persian]
  29. Mohammadzadeh Sepehri, M. (2020). Content analysis of the first-grade Persian book based on Gardner’s multiple intelligences. Modern Advances in Educational Management, 1(2). [in Persian]
  30. Montessori, M. (2017). The Montessori method. (J. M. cV. Hunt, Intro.; J. Valsiner, New intro.). Routledge.
  31. Mostaghni, A., & Etemadi, S. (2017). Sense of a place formation in children. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 9(17), 103–113. [in Persian]
  32. Mussen, P. H., Kagan, J., Huston, A. C., & Conger, J. J. (2006). Roshd va shakhsiyat-e kudak [Child development and personality] (M. Yasaei, Trans., 9th ed.). Tehran: Markaz Publishing. [in Persian]
  33. Noghrekār, A., et al. (2009). Designing kindergarten spaces based on the relationship between creativity traits and architectural ideas. Educational Innovations, 8(32), 39–59. [in Persian]
  34. Pirkhayefi, A. (2010). The role of learning technologies in nurturing students’ creativity. Innovation and Creativity in the Humanities, 1(1), Winter, 2010. [in Persian]
  35. Raxmatova, I. I., & O’rolova, D. (2023). Development of creative ability and imagination in children. Journal of New Century Innovations, 22(1), 108–112.
  36. Saif, A. A. (2020). Modern educational psychology. Tehran: Doran. [in Persian]
  37. Shafa’i, M., & Madani, R. (2010). Educational space design principles for children based on the creativity model. Educational Technology Research Journal, 4(3), 215–222. [in Persian]
  38. Shari’atmadari, A. (2013). Principles and criteria of educational space design. Tehran: Organization for Renovation and Development of Schools. [in Persian]
  39. Tabatabaeian, M. (2004). Developing a test to assess instructors' attitudes toward creativity. Andisheh va Raftar (Thought and Behavior), 10(1–2), 100–109. [in Persian]
  40. Tababaeian, M., Abbasalizadeh, S., Vokalaei, R., & Fayyaz, R. (2016). Investigating the effect of nature on children's creativity. Arman Shahr Journal, 17, 91–102. [in Persian]
  41. Torrance, P. (1993). Talent and creativity: Their test and development (H. Ghasemzadeh, Trans.). Tehran: New World Publishing. [in Persian]
  42. Turnbull, M., Little, A., & Allan, M. (2010). Creativity and collaborative learning and teaching strategies in the design discipline. Arts Education Policy Review, 111, 52–62.
  43. Wojciehowski, M., & Ernst, J. (2018). Creative by nature: Investigating the impact of nature preschools on young children's creative thinking. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 6(1), 3–20.
  44. Zarei, E., Zeinalipour, H., & Behroozi, A. (2016). Exploring Gardner’s theory shift from intelligence to mind: Five minds for the future. Panj Zehn Barāye Ayandeh, 1, 126–141. [in Persian]