بررسی تأثیرات ادغام طبیعت در طراحی معماری شهری بر کیفیت زندگی (مطالعۀ موردی: شهر آمل)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه ملی مهارت، تهران، ایران.

چکیده
در دنیای امروزی، شهرها به محیط‌های پیچیده و پویایی تبدیل شده‌اند که زندگی روزمرۀ انسان‌ها را به‌طور قابل توجهی تحت‌تأثیر قرار می‌دهند. شهر آمل با چالش‌های خاصی نظیر آلودگی هوا، کمبود فضاهای سبز و بی‌توجهی به ابعاد انسانی در طراحی شهری مواجه است. هدف اصلی این پژوهش شناسایی راهکارهایی برای ادغام مؤثر طبیعت در طراحی معماری مدرن به‌منظور بهبود کیفیت زندگی است. روش پژوهش توصیفی‌ـ‌تحلیلی و کمی است و داده‌ها از طریق پرسشنامه‌های ساختاریافته شامل 42 شاخص جمع‌آوری شده است. نمونه‌گیری به‌صورت تصادفی ساده انجام و حجم نمونه 385 پرسشنامه تعیین شده است. داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SPSS و روش‌های آماری توصیفی و استنباطی تحلیل شده‌اند. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که ساکنان نسبت به مشارکت اجتماعی و احساس امنیت رضایت بالایی دارند. بااین‌حال، کیفیت محیط‌زیست با میانگین نمرۀ 3.2 پایین‌ترین رتبه را دارد و نیاز به بهبود زیرساخت‌های محیطی را نمایان می‌کند. همچنین، دسترسی به خدمات عمومی به‌عنوان عامل کلیدی شناسایی شده و تأثیر قوی‌تری بر کیفیت زندگی دارد. تحلیل رگرسیون تأیید می‌کند که امنیت و ایمنی، کیفیت محیط‌زیست و مشارکت اجتماعی نیز تأثیر معناداری بر کیفیت زندگی ساکنان دارند. این یافته‌ها به برنامه‌ریزان شهری کمک می‌کند تا در جهت بهبود کیفیت زندگی تصمیمات مؤثری اتخاذ کنند. به‌ویژه، نیاز به توجه ویژه به بهبود فضای سبز و کاهش آلودگی‌ها به‌عنوان اولویت‌های اصلی مطرح می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Investigating the Effects of Integrating Nature into Urban Architectural Design on Quality of Life (Case Study: Amol City)

نویسندگان English

Maryam Fallah
Sahar Majidi Hatke Loui
Mahsa Haghani
Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, National Skill University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract

Introduction

In today’s world, cities have transformed into complex and dynamic environments that significantly affect people’s daily lives. Uncontrolled urban development, population growth, climate change, and depletion of natural resources are among the factors that have posed serious challenges to urban quality of life. One of the most critical challenges is air pollution, which has become a global issue, threatening the physical and mental health of citizens. Amol, as one of the key cities in Mazandaran Province, faces challenges such as air pollution, a lack of green spaces, and insufficient attention to human dimensions in urban design.

The reduction of green spaces due to uncontrolled construction and the lack of sustainable design principles has deprived residents of access to relaxing and recreational areas. This situation not only negatively impacts the physical and mental health of citizens but also reduces social interactions, increases feelings of loneliness and loss of identity among residents, and ultimately leads to increased public dissatisfaction.

Given Amol’s unique natural and cultural characteristics, the integration of nature into urban architectural design as a strategy for improving quality of life is more essential than ever. Green spaces and natural elements, in addition to enhancing the aesthetic appeal of urban environments, can help reduce pollution, alleviate stress, foster social interactions, strengthen the sense of belonging, and preserve the cultural and natural identity of the city. Accordingly, this study aims to identify effective strategies for integrating nature into modern architectural design to improve the quality of urban life in Amol.

Research Methodology

This study, which investigates the impact of nature integration into urban architectural design on the quality of life of Amol residents, employs a descriptive-analytical and quantitative methodology. The primary tool for data collection is structured questionnaires, comprising 42 objective and subjective indicators across social, economic, environmental, and physical dimensions. The indicators were selected based on literature review, fundamental theories, and analysis of residents’ needs to provide precise and comprehensive information about the factors influencing quality of life.

The collected data was analyzed using SPSS software. Quantitative data was examined through descriptive and inferential statistical methods, including mean, standard deviation, correlation analysis, and regression analysis. These methods helped identify relationships between quality of life indicators and the influencing factors, with results presented in both quantitative and qualitative formats.

Simple random sampling was used, and the sample size was determined to be 385 questionnaires based on Cochran’s formula. The questionnaires were randomly distributed among residents of various areas in Amol to ensure representation of real opinions and experiences. Prior to final distribution, the reliability and validity of the tool were evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha test, which yielded acceptable reliability results with a Cronbach’s alpha above 0.7.

Findings

The findings indicate that Amol residents are highly satisfied with certain quality-of-life indicators such as social participation and a sense of security. Specifically, the security and safety indicator, with a mean score of 3.8, ranked the highest, reflecting residents’ relative sense of security. Designing well-lit and safe public spaces can enhance this feeling and lead to a reduction in crime rates within the community. The social participation indicator, with a mean score of 3.6, ranked second, underscoring the importance of social interactions in improving quality of life. These interactions can be fostered through social and cultural events held in public spaces.

However, the environmental quality indicator, with a mean score of 3.2, received the lowest ranking, highlighting the urgent need for improved environmental infrastructure and expanded green spaces in Amol. Air pollution and the reduction of green spaces are among the major issues faced by residents. Modern architectural design must focus on preserving and creating green spaces while reducing environmental pollution to improve environmental quality and provide a healthier living environment.

Regression analysis revealed that access to public services, with a coefficient of 0.45, has the strongest impact on quality of life. This indicator, which includes access to healthcare, education, and public transportation services, was identified as a key factor in improving quality of life. Moreover, security and safety (coefficient 0.30), environmental quality (coefficient 0.25), and social participation (coefficient 0.20) also significantly influence quality of life.

Conclusion

The findings of this study demonstrate that integrating nature into urban architectural design can have significant impacts on residents’ quality of life. Improving environmental quality through the creation and maintenance of green spaces and the reduction of air pollution is identified as a top priority. Additionally, designing public spaces that promote social interactions can strengthen the sense of belonging to the environment and enhance overall quality of life.

This study also emphasizes that urban planners must simultaneously address social, economic, and environmental dimensions to make effective decisions for sustainable development and improving quality of life. The results of this research can serve as a resource for identifying challenges and opportunities and providing practical solutions to improve urban living conditions in Amol. Sustainable urban design that incorporates nature not only enhances quality of life but also preserves the cultural and natural identity of the city, contributing to long-term development.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Nature Integration
Modern Architectural Design
Quality of Life
Amol City
Green Spaces
 
1.       Afrasi, Rasoul, Nikrosh, Fatemeh, Hosseinpour, Haleh. (2023). Evaluating Urban Quality of Life: A Case Study of Region 2 Tehran. Urban Planning Geography Research, 11(3), 213-237. 237. doi: 10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.366022.1864 [in Persian ]
2.       Aliyari, M. (2024). Natural Landscapes and the Psychological Impact of Environment on Architecture: Examining the Synergy Between Nature and Spatial Design. 1 (4), 67–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63053/ijset.48
3.       Bagherian, Khadijeh, Hosseini, Seyyed Hadi, Salmani-Moghadam, Mohammad. (2022). Spatial Differences in Quality of Life in the Urban Fabric of Nowshahr: An Analysis. Continuity and Social Change, 2(1), 129-150. doi: 10.22034/jscc.2022.2769 [in Persian ]
4.       Barełkowski, R., & Rosolski, S. (2022). Multilevel integration of design and the quality of life in urban space issue. Przestrzeń i Forma, 2022 (50), 251–273.
5.       Harris, R. (2019). The impact of green spaces on urban quality of life: A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101112
6.       Hazrati, Mohammad Hossein, Ahmadzadeh, Hassan, Panahi, Ali. (2022). Measuring the Impact of Urban Tourism Development on the Quality of Life of Residents in Tabriz Metropolis. Urban Economics and Planning, 4(3), 142-157. doi: 10.22034/uep.2023.419807. [in Persian ]
7.       Jazayeri, Seyedeh Hedi, Poursaeid, Alireza, Omidi Najaf Abadi, Maryam. (2022). Assessing the Management Capacities of Tehran in Strategic Planning for Urban Green Space Development. Studies in Human Settlement Planning, 18(2), 63-81. Research Article Dor: 20.1001.1.25385968.1402.18.2.3.2
7.[in Persian ]
8.       Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
9.       Khademi, Amir Hossein, Jokar Serhengi, Dr. Issa. (2018). Comparative Study of Quality of Life in the Urban Fabric and City Center of Amol. Regional Urban Geography and Planning, 8(29), 159-178. doi: 10.22111/gaij.2018.4334 [in Persian]
10.   Mahdavi Kian, Zahra Sadat. (2021). Genealogy of the Biological Analogy of the Process of Learning from Nature in Architectural Design. Architectural Poetics, 2(7), 25-48. https://sid.ir/paper/1030505/fa[in Persian ]
11.   Mahdinejad Jamal Al-Din, Siros Sabri Reza, Damavandi Majid Abrahim, Abbas Pour Asadollah Javaneh. (1391). Architectural Design Based on the Interaction of Aesthetics and Functionality in Nature. City Identity, 6(10), 59-66. https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/1650092021-10520-98-71. [in Persian ]
12.   Mazidi, Ahmad, Rousta, Iman, Mohammadi Ravari, Forough. (2022). Temporal Changes of Urban Heat Islands and Their Relation to Air Pollution Using Remote Sensing in Kerman City. Climate Change Research, 4(14), 103-120. doi: 10.30488/ccr.2023.404996.1151[in Persian ]
13.   Mazur, Ł. (2020). Wybrane czynniki przyrodnicze kształtujące budownictwo mieszkaniowewe współczesnych miastach. 19 (2), 83–91. DOI: 10.22630/ASPA.2020.19.2.20
14.   Mohammadi, Khosro, Tandrosaleh, Neda, Hojjati, Vahideh. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Influential Components of Biophilic Architecture in Contemporary Residential Complexes and Traditional Housing (Case Study: Shiraz City). International Conference on New Research in Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Planning. https://civilica.com/doc/2126065[in Persian ]
15.   Orak, Neda, Nissi, Mohammad. (2023). The Impact of Urban Green Spaces on the Quality of Life of Citizens in Shushtar County. New Approaches in Water and Environmental Engineering, 3(1), 71-83. doi: 10.22034/nawee.2024.453282.1072 [in Persian ]
16.   Payam, Hatam, Pivastehgar, Yaghoob, Mahboudi Ali. (1403). Explaining the Effects of Participatory Urban Planning on Increasing Urban Livability and Quality of Life. Geographic Research Quarterly, 39(3), 379-386. doi:10.58209/geores.39.3.379 [in Persian ]
17.   Roggema, R. (2019). Nature Driven Urbanism: Contemporary Urban Design Thinking (Vol. 2). Springer. 10-21 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-26717-9_1
18.   Sadeghi, Narges, Shi’eh, Ismail, and Zaker Haghighi, Kianoush. (2022). Measuring Satisfaction with Urban Quality of Life in the Neighborhoods of Karaj City. Welfare Planning and Social Development, 14(55), 381-427. doi: 10.22054/qjsd.2022.55414.2044[in Persian ]
19.   Shabak, Maryam, Salehi Baladehi, Alameh. (2022). Examining Nature-Based Creation in Research-Oriented Design Process in Architecture. Green Architecture Quarterly, 9(4), 187-194. https://civilica.com/doc/2024229[in Persian ]
20.   Shamai, Ali, Pouri Shayesteh, Nazanin. (1401). Analyzing Quality of Life Indicators in Urban Areas of Amol. Urban Ecology Research, 11(3), 35-52. Dor:10.30473/grup.2022.35171.1971[in Persian ]
21.   Shokour, Ali, Ghaed Sharafi, Yasaman, Mashk Sar, Parisa. (2022). An Analysis of the Role of Parks and Urban Green Spaces in Improving Urban Quality of Life (Case Study: Region 6 of Shiraz Municipality). Geography and Environmental Studies, 12(46), 110-129. Dor: 20.1001.1.20087845.1402.12.46.7.1[in Persian ]
22.   Teyah, Saaviz, Mahdizadeh Saraj, Fatemeh, Mahmoudi Zarandi, Mahnaz. (2020). Explaining the Creative Design Model for Architecture Learners, Based on Learning from Nature. Bagh Nazar, 18(100), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2021.258840.4722 [in Persian]
23.   Visintin, C., Garrard, G. E., Weisser, W. W., Baracco, M., Hobbs, R. J., & Bekessy, S. A. (2024). Designing cities for everyday nature. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14328
24.   Yari, Zahra, Ghasemi, Behrouz, Sarmad Saidi, Soheil. (2022). Designing the Human-Geographical Dimensions of the Value-Creating Organization Model in Social Security for Regional Planning and Sustainable Development with a Grounded Theory Approach. Geography Journal (Regional Planning), 13(53), 93-119. doi: 10.22034/jgeoq.2023.274649[in Persian ]
25.   Zhiayanpour, Mehdi, Khadem Al-Faghri, Mahvash, Najee Isfahani, Zahra, and Jalali, Mina. (1402). Urban Quality of Life in Isfahan: Priorities and Constitutive Themes. Applied Sociology, 34(2), 27-44. doi: 10.22108/jas.2023.135391.2333[in Persian ]

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 01 آذر 1404